Between 2008 and 2011, more than one million homes in California were foreclosed. In many cases, lenders and loan servicers did not provide homeowners with a significant opportunity to obtain loss mitigation options to avoid foreclosure, and also engaged in extensive mortgage servicing misconduct. To address this issue, Governor Jerry Brown signed the California Homeowner Bill of Rights into law on July 11, 2012.
On January 1, 2013, California's Homeowner Bill of Rights, went into effect. The law reformed some aspects of the California foreclosure process to provide protections homeowners. On January 1, 2018, many provisions of the Homeowner Bill of Rights were replaced with new ones—a change that was widely considered to benefit lenders and servicers, not homeowners. Then, on September 14, 2018, Governor Brown signed Senate Bill No. 818, which permanently reinstated the expired provisions of the Homeowner Bill of Rights and better protects the interests of homeowners.
Read on to learn how the Homeowner Bill of Rights might be able to help you if you're facing a foreclosure in California.
The Homeowner Bill of Rights was part of California's former Attorney General Kamala D. Harris’ response to the state’s foreclosure crisis and largely came about as a result of the national mortgage settlement between 49 states and certain banks. (Learn more about the the national mortgage settlement.)
However, whereas the national mortgage settlement was only applicable to the five settling banks and their customers, the Homeowner Bill of Rights extends the reforms addressed in the national mortgage settlement to almost all mortgage lenders and servicers that conduct foreclosures in California.
The Homeowner Bill of Rights contains several key provisions, including:
In the past, a lender or servicer could foreclose even while a loss mitigation (foreclosure alternative) application was pending, which is a process called “dual-tracking.” The Homeowner Bill of Rights restricts the dual-tracking of foreclosures in California. (Federal law also restricts dual tracking.)
During the foreclosure crisis, homeowners who called their servicer to get help with mortgage problems typically had to explain their circumstances repeatedly, often to several different representatives. Under the Homeowner Bill of Rights, a servicer has to promptly establish a single point of contact upon a request from a borrower who asks for a foreclosure prevention alternative. The servicer also has to give the homeowner one or more direct means of communication with the single point of contact.
The point of contact must be an individual person or a team of personnel who can:
The single point of contact will remain assigned to the account until all loss mitigation options are exhausted or until the account is brought current.
The Homeowner Bill of Rights requires the lender or servicer to contact, or attempt to contact, the borrower to discuss foreclosure alternatives before starting a foreclosure. Specifically, a servicer has hold off for 30 days after contacting the borrower—or meeting the contact attempt requirements—regarding foreclosure alternatives before recording a notice of default, which is the first official step in a California foreclosure. (To learn more about preforeclosure help for borrowers, see Special Foreclosure Protections in California article.)
While this requirement appears straightforward, some borrowers in California have sought to prevent or delay foreclosures by filing lawsuits alleging that their lenders or servicers failed to comply with this requirement because contact was initiated by the borrowers, instead of the lenders or servicers. The borrowers' argument was, under the Homeowner Bill of Rights, lenders or servicers—not borrowers—are required to initiate contact. But various federal courts disagreed and found that the contact requirement is satisfied regardless of who initiates the contact, so long as contact is made and the parties discuss foreclosure alternatives. Also, on November 7, 2018, the California Court of Appeal formally agreed with the federal courts' interpretation of the statute, and held that borrower-initiated contact satisfies the legal requirements. (Schmidt v. Citibank, N.A., 28 Cal.App.5th 1109 (Cal. Ct. App. 2018)).
Homeowners may sue the lender or servicer for material violations of certain sections of the California Homeowner Bill of Rights. Potential relief includes:
In addition, if the court finds that the violation was intentional, reckless, or resulted from willful misconduct by a loan servicer or lender, the court may award the borrower the greater of treble actual damages or statutory damages of $50,000.
The protections afforded to homeowners by the Homeowner Bill of Rights generally apply to first lien mortgage loans for properties that are:
Smaller servicers (entities that conduct fewer than 175 foreclosure sales per year or annual reporting period) are exempt from some of the procedural requirements.
To get additional general information about the Homeowner Bill of Rights, go to the State of California Department of Justice’s website and search for “Homeowner Bill of Rights”. To get specific information about how California's Homeowner Bill of Rights applies in your situation and whether you have any defenses to a foreclosure, talk to a foreclosure lawyer. To get more information about foreclosure alternatives, like a loan modification, consider making an appointment to talk to a HUD-approved housing counselor.