In California, a new law (AB 130) offers strong protections for homeowners facing foreclosure due to a "zombie" second mortgage. Signed into law on June 30, 2025, and effective immediately, AB 130 limits the ability of lenders and debt collectors to foreclose based on old second mortgages that borrowers often believed were settled, forgiven, or were part of a first mortgage loan modification.
Here are the key features of this foreclosure law, with more details below.
A "second mortgage" is a loan that a homeowner takes out in addition to their original, or "first," mortgage. Second mortgages come in different forms, such as home equity loans and home equity lines of credit (HELOCs). Sometimes, a homeowner might have a first mortgage, a second mortgage, and even a third mortgage.
Like the first mortgage, a second mortgage is secured by using the home as collateral. If you take out a second mortgage, you typically sign a promissory note (an agreement to repay the loan) and a second mortgage contract that creates a lien against your property.
The first mortgage is the "primary" lien on the home and has priority for repayment in a foreclosure. (In most cases, liens get priority in the order in which they're recorded in the land records.) The second mortgage is "subordinate," meaning it gets paid only after the first mortgage is satisfied. So, the second mortgage is second in line to be repaid if the home is sold at a foreclosure sale.
A "zombie" mortgage is a loan that unexpectedly reappears after being forgotten or believed resolved. This term refers to a mortgage debt (typically a second mortgage) that a homeowner thought was forgiven, satisfied, discharged, included in a first mortgage modification, or written off. In many cases, there has been no communication from the lender or loan servicer for years. Yet, the mortgage debt eventually resurfaces, with the lender (or perhaps a debt collector) demanding payment.
An old second mortgage is also sometimes called a "silent second mortgage."
Many zombie second mortgages were taken out before the 2008 foreclosure crisis, frequently as a second loan in "80/20" or "piggyback" mortgage arrangements, where the first loan covered 80% and the second covered the remaining 20% of a home's value. When the economy and housing market crashed, homeowners defaulted on these second mortgages in record numbers, especially in California.
During the housing crisis, lenders regularly charged these loans off and stopped trying to collect payments on them. They quit sending billing statements and stopped communicating with borrowers. In many cases, the lenders sold these second mortgage debts to new owners, just to be rid of them and get something (if only pennies on the dollar) for their investments.
Because lenders stopped sending bills and ceased contacting borrowers, many homeowners believed their debts were gone.
Now, years later, home values have not only recovered, but gone up considerably. So, the new owners of these second mortgage debts (or debt collectors on their behalf) are trying to collect on them, threatening foreclosure or demanding repayment with back interest and fees. This comes as a shock to homeowners who didn't know the debt still existed.
A zombie mortgage is generally still a valid debt unless it was canceled, paid off, or no longer enforceable due to the statute of limitations. However, state laws sometimes give specific protections to borrowers against zombie second mortgage debt, including how and when these debts can be collected. States withlaws that cover zombie second mortgage foreclosure procedures and notices include California, Connecticut, Ohio, and Virginia.
California's AB 130 added a new section to the state's foreclosure laws. (Cal. Civ. Code § 2924.13 (2025).) This California law, which became effective on July 1, 2025, provides homeowner protections against nonjudicial and judicial foreclosure proceedings associated with zombie second mortgages.
Specifically, this law places certain requirements on lenders trying to collect on zombie loans and puts restrictions on when these old debts can be foreclosed. The law provides borrowers with powerful defenses against zombie second mortgages.
Here's what the law requires and prohibits.
When recording a notice of default as the first step in the California foreclosure process, the servicer, lender, or the foreclosure trustee must record a certification under penalty of perjury that the servicer (and all prior servicers) didn't engage in any of the unlawful practices under the law (described below). Further, the servicer must list all instances when it and all prior servicers committed any of the illegal practices. (Cal. Civ. Code § 2924.13(a),(c) (2025).)
This certification requirement is significant: The current servicer must not only certify that it has not committed any unlawful practice, but also that all prior servicers also didn't commit any unlawful practice. If a prior servicer has gone out of business, this is a difficult task. How can a current servicer be sure that a previous, defunct servicer followed all of the rules? If you find yourself in this situation, you might have a defense to a zombie second mortgage foreclosure. Also, servicers commonly make errors when handling loans. It's certainly possible that a servicer made a mistake that's illegal under AB 130 at some point during the life of the loan.
Simultaneously with the service of a recorded notice of default, the servicer must also send the borrower a copy of the certification (via certified mail with return receipt requested) and a notice that, if the borrower believes the servicer or any prior servicer engaged in any unlawful practice or that borrower believes the servicer misrepresented the compliance history of the entire loan, the borrower may petition a California court for relief before the foreclosure sale. (Cal. Civ. Code § 2924.13 (c) (2025).)
Under this law, if you file a petition to challenge a nonjudicial foreclosure, a court will give you an automatic injunction against the foreclosure. (Cal. Civ. Code § 2924.13(d) (2025).) This legal right is a big deal—you can stop a second mortgage foreclosure (temporarily or perhaps, in the right circumstances, permanently) by merely filing a petition in the appropriate court.
If the lender initiates a judicial foreclosure, you may raise the unlawful practices as an affirmative defense. (Cal. Civ. Code § 2924.13(e) (2025).)
Whether a zombie second mortgage foreclosure will be merely delayed or permanently derailed is up to the discretion of the trial judge.
If the current or prior servicer committed any of the following illegal practices under the law, you can challenge the foreclosure in court.
Under this law, you can get relief from a nonjudicial foreclosure either before or after a foreclosure sale. Again, what relief or remedy you'll get is up to the discretion of the judge overseeing the case. (In a judicial foreclosure, you must raise violations of this law as an affirmative defense.)
If you ask a court for relief before a foreclosure sale occurs in a nonjudicial foreclosure, the sale will be enjoined (paused) until a court makes a final determination. (Cal. Civ. Code § 2924.13(d) (2025).)
Under the law, the court may provide equitable remedies that the court deems appropriate, depending on the extent and severity of the mortgage servicer's violations. So, the court might strike all or a portion of the arrears claim, bar foreclosure, or permit foreclosure subject to future compliance and corrected arrearage claim. (Cal. Civ. Code § 2924.13(f) (2025).) (This applies to nonjudicial and judicial foreclosures.)
You may file suit to have a nonjudicial foreclosure sale set aside (made invalid) if:
The law's requirements apply to every loan servicer who managed the loan, even if a predecessor company is no longer in business. In addition, the law is generally directed at nonjudicial foreclosures, but it also says that homeowners may raise any of the unlawful practices as affirmative defenses in any judicial foreclosure on a subordinate mortgage in California. (Cal. Civ. Code § 2924.13(a),(e) (2025).)
Ultimately, this law gives borrowers the ability to challenge a zombie second mortgage foreclosure in court if they believe there has been loan servicing misconduct under AB 130, including issues with compliance by prior servicers. However, you should be aware that any failure to comply with the provisions of this law won't affect the validity of a trustee's sale or a sale in favor of a bona fide purchaser. (Cal. Civ. Code § 2924.13(h) (2025).)
Homeowners facing the threat of foreclosure because of a zombie second mortgage should consider talking to a foreclosure lawyer immediately to explore all options for fighting the foreclosure. This law might be able to provide you with defenses or options to avoid losing your home.