After losing scores of valuable employees (and trade secrets) to competitors, a growing number of employers are requiring employees to sign noncompete agreements. These agreements are sometimes called "noncompete covenants," "restrictive covenants," or "promises not to compete."
What are these agreements? As their name suggests, they are contracts in which the employee promises not to unfairly "compete" against the employer, usually by not working for a competitor company within a certain period of time after leaving the employer. Noncompete agreements will also typically include related promises, such as not to solicit clients or employees away from the employer. These agreements are often contained in a clause within a larger employment contract, though they can also be a stand-alone contract.
Should you require your employees to sign noncompete agreements? And, more importantly, will such agreements be enforceable in court?
Noncompete agreements are helpful for employers in multiple ways. First, they discourage employees from leaving your company, since they would be prohibited from working for direct competitors. Imagine that you have a talented computer engineer on your staff. Normally, she might apply for a job at a competing firm across the street and attempt to negotiate a raise in salary or title. But a noncompete agreement would frighten her away from applying to such a job (and would frighten the competing firm from hiring her) due to the prospect of litigation. This keeps talent at your company.
Second, noncompete agreements can protect your company's confidential information. If one of your employees has access to sensitive business information or trade secrets, you will obviously want to prevent this employee from disclosing this information to your competitors.
A trade secret is information that gives your company a competitive advantage because it is not generally known and cannot be readily learned by other people who could benefit from it. It can be a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process that you have made reasonable efforts to keep secret. For more information, see Trade Secret Basics FAQ.
When an employee with access to trade secrets leaves your company, either because the employee quit or has been fired, he or she could take this information and use it to personal advantage (at your expense). For example, a former employee may open a competing business or may go to work for a competitor and unwittingly or deliberately divulge your hard-won keys to success.
A properly drafted noncompete agreement can prevent this situation by (i) frightening your employee away from this course of action and (ii) giving you a clear path to sue the employee if it happens.
Even in states that allow noncompete agreements, such agreements are scrutinized closely by courts. While these agreements are an effective way to protect your business's trade secrets, you should know that the legal system puts a high value on a person's right to earn a living. If your agreement ends up under a legal microscope, it will have to pass some commonsense hurdles. Here are some things a court will consider in deciding whether to enforce your noncompete agreement.
First and foremost, you need a good faith business reason for asking an employee to sign the noncompete agreement. The agreement should not simply punish an employee for leaving your company. Most likely, your business reason will be to protect your specific trade secrets or a customer base you have worked long and hard to develop.
If you are selective about the employees who sign such agreements, you will increase your chances of success, because judges are much more likely to enforce agreements against employees who truly possess "inside" information. For example, it might be difficult to justify having a janitor sign such an agreement, as compared to an engineer.
Next, you must provide a benefit to the employee in exchange for his or her promise not to compete with you after departure. Making a job offer contingent on signing a noncompete agreement probably satisfies this requirement, since the employee is receiving a benefit (a job) in exchange for the promise.
It is more difficult to provide an existing employee with a benefit, but generally, coupling the agreement with a promotion or a raise will do the trick.
A noncompete agreement must also be "reasonable." What's reasonable? Courts will typically consider these factors:
Of these concerns, the most common issue with noncompete agreements is how long it lasts. While there is no set rule, noncompete agreements ranging from six months to two years are generally considered "reasonable," while anything longer will receive closer scrutiny.
When putting together your agreement, think about:
While these rules might seem discouraging, they exist for a reason: to protect employees from unscrupulous employers. As long as you are reasonable, the law will be on your side. For a fill-in-the-blank agreement, see Nolo's Employee Noncompete & Nonsolicitation Agreement, which includes detailed instructions.