The big moment has arrived. You're in the courtroom, all parties are present, and the clerk calls your case. What happens next?
First things first. Don't stress out. It'll all be over before you know it. Small claims hearings—like all court cases—follow a similar pattern. Yours will probably go something like this.
Rarely does it take more than 20 to 30 minutes of court time. A few courts are so busy that they give each of the parties a fixed amount of time—5 or 10 minutes—and put them on a stopwatch so they don't run over. The time will seem to fly. Chances are it'll take you longer to drive to the courthouse than it does for the entire hearing.
We start with courtroom tips for both sides. Then we'll provide some suggestions for both the plaintiff and the defendant. We close by taking you through a sample case.
Here are a few tips both parties should find helpful. Keep in mind that these are suggestions, not rules.
Get to court early so you can watch some cases before yours. You'll be much more comfortable when you know what to expect and can see how the judge handles cases. Better yet, go watch a day or two before your hearing, so you'll have more time to adjust your presentation if needed.
Stand when you talk to the judge and when you make your presentation. It's a sign that you respect the court and understand the importance of the proceedings. More importantly, standing gives most people a sense of presence and confidence when they might be a little nervous.
Unless the judge is having a back-and-forth discussion with both of you at the same time, you should sit while your opponent is talking.
This seems to go against all rules of storytelling you've ever learned. But when you're in small claims court, start with the end of the story, not the beginning. That is, after a quick explanatory overview of the case, describe your losses and tell the court what money damages you're asking for. Then go back and tell your story chronologically.
This does two important things. First, you tell the court exactly what you're asking for so you don't have to worry about forgetting to mention it later. Second, it lets the judge know where you're headed.
Notes are fine. They can be a helpful reminder if you're nervous or forget a key point. But don't read your presentation—it's always a bore. And because the judge is likely to ask you some questions while you're talking, you might lose your place if you're just reading.
If the judge starts talking during your presentation (or at any other time while you're speaking), you stop. Immediately. Don't try to talk over the judge and, just as important, don't interrupt when the judge is talking. Regardless of your intent, it'll be taken as a sign of disrespect, and of disregard for courtroom decorum.
The courtroom isn't a place for you to argue with your opponent. The judge will make sure you're not interrupted, and you'll be expected to return that courtesy when it's their turn to talk. You might find what they're saying to be outrageous or a lie. Don't give in to the temptation. You'll have a chance to respond.
The judge will probably ask questions during your presentation. Expect these interruptions and plan your presentation accordingly. Chances are the judge is asking about important elements of your claim or defense, or other key issues in the case. Never put the judge off by saying you'll answer a question later.
Answer directly and truthfully, and right away. When you can answer with a "yes" or "no," you should. Then ask the judge for permission to explain if you think it's necessary.
There might be parts of your case that are hard to explain with words alone. Simply describing an accident scene or injuries you suffered, for example, can come off as dry and lifeless. Be ready to present other exhibits—photos, videos, diagrams, clothing, and the like. If you plan to offer videos, powerpoints, or other visual evidence, check in advance to make sure the court has the necessary technology, that it works, and that you know how to use it.
Have at least three copies of any photos or documents you plan to offer: One for the judge, one for your opponent, and one for you.
You (probably) aren't a lawyer. Trying to act or sound like one won't earn you any points with the court, and it won't help your presentation, either. Just tell the judge your story like you were sitting across the breakfast table from one another. Be organized, precise, and to the point, and don't try to use fancy legal terms. Your witnesses, if you have any, should do the same.
If you've done some legal research and found a statute or case decision that you think helps your case, let the judge know about it during your presentation. Be prepared with a short written memo. The memo should have the case name and number at the top. Then briefly explain what the case or statute says and why you think it applies. Attach the memo to a copy of the case or statute. If the judge agrees to look at it, hand a copy to the court clerk and a copy to your opponent. Be sure to keep a copy for your file, too.
A judge who's convinced that one side is morally in the right will bend over backward to find a legal reason to rule in their favor. For example, if you lent a friend money in an emergency and they're trying to weasel out of repaying based on some legal technicality—maybe claiming the loan was really a gift—make sure the judge understands the trouble your opponent's bad act has caused you.
You'll do your best job in court if you've practiced your presentation. Ask friends or family members to watch with a critical eye. If they don't understand something, chances are the judge won't, either. Encourage them to ask questions while you're presenting, to make the experience as realistic as possible. When you think you've practiced enough? Practice some more.
Your presentation isn't likely to take longer than 5 or 10 minutes. Here are the key parts.
Briefly and clearly tell the judge what the case is about before you start getting into details. Let's say, for example, that your case involves a car wreck that damaged your auto. You might start by saying:
"Your Honor, this case involves a car accident that happened on June 4, 2025 at Cedar and Rose Streets here in town. My car suffered $872 worth of damage when the defendant ran a red light and hit my right front fender. I'm asking the court to order the defendant to pay me $872 in repair costs, plus what it cost me to pursue this case."
Once your introduction is complete, move on to presenting your evidence and witnesses.
Be ready to present—and explain the relevance of—any papers, photos, or other documents or evidence you offer. Unlike regular court, you don't need to use any magic legal words in small claims court. Start with a quick explanation. For example:
When you're done with the description, ask for permission to give the evidence to the court. The judge will almost certainly agree. Don't hand it to the judge directly unless you're told to do so. Instead, give it to the court clerk.
Your witnesses normally will speak after you finish your presentation. They should be thoroughly prepared to present their testimony in a complete, organized, but brief way.
Don't expect to do any "Perry Mason" style questioning of your witnesses or cross-examination of your opponent's witnesses. The judge probably will ask most of the questions. When a witness leaves out an important point, ask the judge to let them explain. For example: "Your Honor, Ms. Peterson hasn't said anything about the color of the traffic light. Would you please ask her to cover that?"
The same goes if your opponent or one of their witnesses skirts an important issue. When it's your turn to speak, say something like, "Your Honor, the defendant hasn't said anything about how many beers he drank that night. Would you ask him to explain?"
If you're the defendant, you'll have a turn once the plaintiff is finished. Handle your evidence and witnesses in the same way we described for plaintiffs, above.
Here's one of the most common mistakes defendants make in court: They get so angry at something the plaintiff said that when they get to speak, they attack angrily. The judge won't find this helpful. In fact, it's usually counterproductive.
You'll score far more points by calmly and clearly presenting your side of the story. Start with the key points of contention and then fill in the details. If the plaintiff made false or misleading statements, be sure to point them out. Here's an example.
"Your Honor, it's true that my truck bumper hit the plaintiff's fender and pushed it in slightly. But the key point is that this happened because the plaintiff's car entered the intersection before it was clear. In other words, the accident was the plaintiff's fault.
Here's how it happened. I was driving south on Cedar and entered the intersection just as the light first turned yellow. I slowed briefly near the center line behind a car that was turning left and then continued across. At that point, the plaintiff's car darted in front of me."
Here's how a case might be presented.
Clerk: "The next case is John Andrews v. Robertson Realty. Will everyone please come forward?" (Four people come forward and sit at the table facing the judge.)
Judge: "Good morning. Which one of you is Mr. Andrews? Okay, will you begin, Mr. Andrews?"
John Andrews: (stands) "This is a case about the defendant's failure to return my $700 cleaning deposit, Your Honor. I'm asking for the return of my deposit and statutory damages.
I rented a house from Robertson Realty at 1611 Spruce Street in Rockford in March 20xx, on a month-to-month tenancy. On January 10, 20xx, I sent Mr. Robertson written notice that I was planning to move on March 10. In fact, I moved out on March 8 and left the place extremely clean. I know it was clean because I spent eight hours, a lot of them on my hands and knees, cleaning it. In addition, all of my rent was paid.
A few days after I moved out, I asked Mr. Robertson to return my $700 deposit. He wrote me a letter stating that the place was dirty and he was keeping my money.
I have a letter I wrote to Mr. Robertson on March 15, setting out my position in more detail. I also have some photographs that my friend, Carol Spann, who is here as a witness, took on the day I moved out. I believe the pictures show pretty clearly that I did a thorough cleanup. Can I give these to the court?" (After the court agrees, Andrews hands the letter and pictures to the clerk, who hands them to the judge.)
"Your Honor, I'm asking not only for my $700 deposit, but also for $1,400 in statutory damages, which the law of this state allows a tenant when a landlord improperly refuses to return a deposit."
Judge: "Mr. Andrews, will you introduce your witness?"
Andrews: "Yes, this is Carol Spann. She helped me clean up and move on March 7 and 8."
Judge: (looking at the pictures) "Ms. Spann, were you in the house the day John Andrews moved out?"
Carol Spann: (standing) "Yes, your Honor, I was—and the day before, too. I helped clean up, and I can say that we did a good job. Not only did we do the normal washing and scrubbing, but we waxed the kitchen floor, cleaned the bathroom tile, and shampooed the rugs."
Judge: (turning to Mr. Robertson) "Okay, now it's your turn to tell me why the deposit wasn't returned."
Harry Robertson: (standing) "I don't know how they could have cleaned the place up, your Honor, because it was filthy when I inspected it on March 9. Let me give you a few specifics.
There was mildew and mold around the bathtub, the windows were filthy, the refrigerator hadn't been defrosted, and there was dog—how shall I say it—dog manure in the basement. Your Honor, I brought Clem Houndstooth as a witness. Mr. Houndstooth is the tenant who moved in three days after Mr. Andrews moved out. Incidentally, your Honor, the place was so dirty that I only charged Mr. Houndstooth a $200 cleaning deposit, because he agreed to clean it up himself."
Judge: (looking at Clem Houndstooth) "Do you wish to say something?"
Clem Houndstooth: (standing) "Yes, I do. Mr. Robertson asked me to come down and back him up and I'm glad to do it because I put in two full days cleaning that place up. I like a clean house, your Honor, not a halfway clean, halfway dirty house. I just don't think that a house is clean if the oven is full of gunk, there is mold in the bathroom, and the insides of the cupboards are grimy.
All these conditions existed when I moved in. I just don't believe that anyone could think that place was clean."
Judge: "Mr. Andrews, anything to add?"
John Andrews: (standing up) "Yes, I sure do. First, as to the mildew problem. The house is 40 years old, and there's some dampness in the wall of the bathroom. Maybe there's a leaky pipe someplace behind the tile. I cleaned it a number of times, but it always came back. I talked to Mr. Fisk in Mr. Robertson's office about the problem about a month after I moved in, and he said I'd have to do the best I could because they couldn't afford to tear the wall apart.
As to the cupboards and stove, they're both old. The cabinets haven't been painted in 10 years, so, of course, they aren't perfect. And that old stove was a lot dirtier when I moved in than it is now, because I can tell you I personally worked on it with oven cleaner for over an hour."
Judge: "What about the refrigerator, Mr. Andrews? Was that defrosted?"
John Andrews: "No, your Honor, it wasn't, but it had been defrosted about three weeks before I moved out, and I thought that it was good enough the way it was."
Judge: "Okay, if no one else has anything to add, I want to return your pictures and letters. You'll get my decision by mail in a few days."
Now, for the rest of the story. This case is based on a real small claims dispute. Here's what the judge said later about how he resolved it.
"This is a typical case in which both sides have some right on their side. What's clean to one person may be dirty to another. Based on what I heard, I would have to guess that the old tenant made a fairly conscientious effort to clean up, and probably left the place about as clean as it was when he moved in.
But the new tenant, Houndstooth, had much higher standards and convinced the landlord that it was filthy. The landlord may not have needed too much convincing since he probably would just as well keep the deposit. I heard enough to convince me that Andrews, the old tenant, didn't do a perfect job cleaning up.
My decision was that Andrews got a judgment for the return of $450 of the $700 deposit, with no statutory damages. I believe that $250 was more than enough to compensate the landlord for any damages he suffered as a result of the house 'being a little dirty.'"
Did the judge think the case was well presented?
"Better than average. I think I got a pretty good idea of what the problems were. The witnesses were helpful and the pictures gave me a pretty good idea that the place wasn't a total mess. Both sides could have done better, however. Andrews could have presented a witness to testify to the condition of the house when he moved in if, in fact, it was truly a lot dirtier than when he left.
Another witness to testify to the fact that the house was clean when he moved out would have been good, too. His friend, Carol Spann, seemed to be a very close friend, and I wasn't sure that she was objective when it came to judging whether or not the place was clean.
The landlord, Robertson, could also have done better. He could have presented a more disinterested witness, although I must say that Houndstooth's testimony was pretty convincing. Also he could have had pictures documenting the dirty conditions and an estimate from a cleaning company for how much they would have charged to clean the place up.
Without going to too much trouble, I think both sides could have probably done somewhat better with more thorough preparation."
Depending on the facts and the issues, it might make sense to get a lawyer's help when you prepare your case. They'll know the elements of your claim or defense, the kind of evidence you need, and how best to present it to the court.
Hiring a lawyer won't be a good idea if you're fighting over just a few hundred dollars. But if thousands of dollars are on the line, buying an hour or two of attorney time could prove to be a wise investment.