Fault in "Chain Reaction" Car Accidents

Some rear-end car accidents involve a "chain" of multiple vehicles all colliding with one another. Who's liable for this kind of crash?

A "chain reaction" traffic accident occurs when three or more vehicles hit one another in a series of rear-end accidents that are caused primarily by the force of the first collision. Here’s an example of a typical chain reaction accident:

Driver D --> Driver C --> Driver B --> Driver A

Driver B rear-ends the car in front of him, which is being driven by Driver A. Because Driver C was following Driver B too closely and could not stop in time, Driver C also rear-ends Driver B. The same situation occurs behind Driver C, with Driver D being unable to stop in time to avoid rear-ending Driver C. Another wrinkle is that the force of the collision between Driver B and Driver A could send Driver A’s vehicle forward into the next vehicle in the line, and so on, causing another chain reaction.

Because chain reaction accidents may involve many different drivers who were each acting carelessly (at least to some degree), bringing a car insurance claim or personal injury lawsuit over these kinds of accidents may be challenging. Let’s look at some of the different issues that may arise -- especially when it comes to establishing fault -- in car accident cases involving chain reaction accidents.

Establishing Who Was at Fault

If you file an insurance claim or lawsuit against another motorist after a chain reaction accident, you’ll need to prove liability under a legal theory called "negligence." Figuring out which driver was negligent is mostly a matter of determining which driver’s carelessness caused the accident -- or, if more than one driver was negligent, determining each driver’s share of liability.

One rule of the road that comes into play in most chain reaction accidents is that drivers must leave a safe following distance between their vehicle and the vehicle in front of them, so that they can stop in time to avoid any road hazards or unexpected situations, such as the lead car slamming on its brakes. A driver who fails to maintain a safe following distance and then rear-ends the lead car will almost always be considered negligent.

But what if your car is pushed into the vehicle in front of you, because you got hit from behind yourself?

Let’s revisit the example we discussed above:

Driver D --> Driver C --> Driver B --> Driver A

In this scenario, Driver A will need to establish the sequence of events that led to Driver B’s rear-ending Driver A.

Did Driver C rear-end Driver B, pushing Driver B into Driver A? If this was the case, then Driver C would be at fault for driving carelessly and not leaving enough distance to stop in time. If that’s the case, Driver C would likely be at fault for the car accident, and would be on the hook to both Driver A and Driver B for damages stemming from this accident (in reality, Driver C's car insurance carrier would be financially responsible, up to policy limits).

What if Driver B rear-ended Driver A, and then Driver C, unable to stop in time, rear-ended Driver B? In this case, Driver A would feel more than one impact, and both Driver C and Driver B would owe Driver A for damages stemming from the accident. Driver A could file a claim or lawsuit against both drivers, and let them sort out the situation between themselves.

Add Driver D into the mix, and the picture gets even more complicated. Driver B could rear-end Driver A, C could hit B, and D could hit C. Or, Driver D could cause a chain reaction crash him/herself, by hitting Driver C from behind, sending C into B, and B into A.

However a chain reaction car accident plays out, there are a number of sources that can help you establish the order of impacts, and who was careless. These include:

  • eyewitness accounts (including your own, those of the passengers in each car, passers-by, and the drivers of the cars behind you)
  • police reports prepared in connection with the accident, including the reporting officer's findings as to whether any driver committed a traffic violation
  • vehicle damage, and
  • evidence gathered at the scene of the accident, including skid marks and vehicle debris.

Getting Help

It may not make sense to try to handle your own car insurance claim or lawsuit after a car accident, especially when your injuries are significant or the other side is trying to pin blame for the accident squarely on you. To make sure your case is in capable hands, and that your right to fair compensation is protected, it may be time to discuss your situation with an experienced personal injury attorney.

Talk to a Lawyer

Start here to find personal injury lawyers near you.

How it Works

  1. Briefly tell us about your case
  2. Provide your contact information
  3. Choose attorneys to contact you
FEATURED LISTINGS FROM NOLO
Swipe to view more
MAKE THE MOST OF YOUR CLAIM

Get the compensation you deserve.

We've helped 215 clients find attorneys today.

How It Works

  1. Briefly tell us about your case
  2. Provide your contact information
  3. Choose attorneys to contact you