If you have left your home country and are seeking protection within the U.S. as an asylee or refugee, you will need to show that the harm you faced in that country, or fear you will encounter if you go back there, constituted or would constitute “persecution.”
But what is persecution according to U.S. immigration law? It’s been clear from the early days of legal recognition of refugee status that people who move to a different country for reasons of mere convenience or economic betterment are not “refugees.” But beyond that, the matter gets a harder to pin down, as addressed in this article.
The word “persecution” comes straight from U.S. immigration law, which mentions it in its definition of “refugee.” (See the Immigration and Nationality Act at I.N.A. Section 101(a)(42).) However, the law does not give any separate definition of persecution, nor specifically list the types of harm that will be considered.
The exception is that (in a relatively new section added in 1996), the law states that people who have or fear being “forced to abort a pregnancy or to undergo involuntary sterilization, or . . . persecuted for failure or refusal to undergo such a procedure or for other resistance to a coercive population control program” meet the definition of refugee. (This amendment was aimed at mainland China with its one-child policy).
In most cases, however, individual applicants will need to prove that what they suffered or fear should be viewed as persecution, drawing on court decisions initiated by previous applicants. Seemingly acknowledging the lack of specificity regarding this concept, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals said that, “Persecution covers a range of acts and harms,” and “[t]he determination that actions rise to the level of persecution is very fact-dependent.” (See Cordon-Garcia v. INS, 204 F.3d 985, 991 (9th Cir. 2000).)
On the other hand, the Seventh Circuit has noted that, “actions must rise above the level of mere ‘harassment’ to constitute persecution.” (See Tamas-Mercea v. Reno, 222 F.3d 417, 424 (7th Cir. 2000).) And the First Circuit added that the experience “must rise above unpleasantness, harassment and even basic suffering.” (See Nelson v. INS, 232 F.3d 258, 263 (1st Cir. 2000).)
Persecution can definitely include harms that aren't physical, or immediate threats to one's life or freedom. (See INS v. Stevic, 467 U.S. 407 (1984); Surita v. INS, 95 F.3d 814 (9th Cir. 1996.).
The above definitions aren’t very satisfying. More often, looking at what actual types of harm have been recognized as forms of persecution helps. These include:
The persecution should have come from either your country’s government or other authorities or groups that the government is unable to control, such as guerrillas, warring tribes or ethnic groups, or organized vigilantes.
Whether women who decided to leave an abusive spouse qualify for asylum is a matter of ongoing debate. For women who live in a male-dominated country where their rights are unprotected, the decision to leave an abusive spouse or leave the country could arguably be viewed as a political opinion, and some have been granted asylum on this basis in the past. Under the Trump Administration, however, then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions reversed years of precedent to declare that immigrants who flee domestic violence are in most cases ineligible for asylum. See Matter of A-B-, 27 I&N Dec. 316 (A.G. 2018). A federal judge in the case of Grace v. Whitaker held that Sessions's decisions violated both the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and the Immigration and Nationality Act. The appeals in this case are ongoing.
What if you don't know who, exactly, was persecuting you? No rule says you have to be able to identify your persecutor. What you will have to do is explain is what exactly happened, and provide enough detail to establish the persecutor's motive.
The persecution must have been based on at least one of five grounds: your race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group. It will be crucial to your case that you figure out which of these categories you fit into, and show a connection (“nexus”) between the persecution and one of them.
For a more in-depth analysis of whether what you suffered or fear amounts to persecution, consult an experienced immigration attorney. And for more information on U.S. asylum law, see the Asylum & Refugee Status section of Nolo’s website.