If you have left your home country and are seeking protection within the U.S. as an asylee or refugee, you will need to show that the harm you faced in that country, or fear you will encounter if you return there, constituted or would constitute "persecution."
But what is persecution according to U.S. immigration law? It's been clear from the early days of legal recognition of refugee status that people who move to a different country for reasons of mere convenience or economic betterment are not "refugees." But beyond that, the matter gets a harder to pin down, as addressed in this article.
The word "persecution" comes straight from U.S. immigration law, which mentions it in its definition of "refugee." (See the Immigration and Nationality Act at I.N.A. Section 101(a)(42).) However, the law does not give any separate definition of persecution, nor specifically list the types of harm that will be considered.
There's one exception, from a relatively new section of the law added in 1996: people who have been or fear being "forced to abort a pregnancy or to undergo involuntary sterilization, or . . . persecuted for failure or refusal to undergo such a procedure or for other resistance to a coercive population control program" meet the definition of refugee. (This amendment was aimed primarily at mainland China with its one-child policy).
In most cases, however, individual applicants will need to prove that what they suffered or fear should be viewed as persecution, drawing on court decisions initiated by previous applicants. Seemingly acknowledging the lack of specificity regarding this concept, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals said, "Persecution covers a range of acts and harms," and "[t]he determination that actions rise to the level of persecution is very fact-dependent." (See Cordon-Garcia v. INS, 204 F.3d 985, 991 (9th Cir. 2000).)
On the other hand, the Seventh Circuit noted that, "actions must rise above the level of mere ‘harassment' to constitute persecution." (See Tamas-Mercea v. Reno, 222 F.3d 417, 424 (7th Cir. 2000).) And the First Circuit added that the experience "must rise above unpleasantness, harassment and even basic suffering." (See Nelson v. INS, 232 F.3d 258, 263 (1st Cir. 2000).)
Persecution can definitely include harms that aren't physical, or immediate threats to one's life or freedom. (See INS v. Stevic, 467 U.S. 407 (1984); Surita v. INS, 95 F.3d 814 (9th Cir. 1996.).
The above definitions aren't very satisfying. More often, it helps to look at what actual types of harm have been recognized by U.S. immigration authorities and courts as forms of persecution. These include:
Some applicants might need to show a combination of actions against them if none by themselves was serious to fit traditional understandings of persecution.
The persecution should have come from either your country's government or other authorities or groups that the government is unable to control, such as guerrillas, warring tribes or ethnic groups, or organized vigilantes.
Whether women who decided to leave an abusive spouse qualify for asylum has been a matter of debate and legal reversals. For women who live in a male-dominated country where their rights are unprotected, the decision to leave an abusive spouse and a country that wouldn't protect them can arguably be viewed as a political opinion or an indication that they're part of a particular social group. Such arguments have led to asylum approvals, but the law on this goes back and forth, so consult an attorney before trying it.
What if you don't know who, exactly, was persecuting you? No rule says you have to be able to identify your persecutor. What you will have to do is explain is what exactly happened, and provide enough detail to establish the persecutor's motive.
The persecution must have been based on at least one of five grounds: your race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group. It will be crucial to your case that you figure out which of these categories you fit into, and show a connection ("nexus") between the persecution and one of them.
For a more in-depth analysis of whether what you suffered or fear amounts to persecution, consult an experienced immigration attorney. And for more information on U.S. asylum law, see the Asylum & Refugee Status section of Nolo's website.
A good attorney might improve your chances of proving persecution and obtaining asylum. The attorney can help you highlight the most compelling portions of your claim, overcome any negative information, prepare the paperwork and supporting documents, help you prepare to testify, and appear with you, either at the Asylum Office or in Immigration Court. Fortunately, asylum is an area where you'll find a lot of help from volunteer attorneys or nonprofit (charitable) organizations serving immigrants and refugees.
Need a lawyer? Start here.