Your lawyer's negligence caused you to lose a case you should have won, costing you thousands of dollars. Can you sue for malpractice? Yes, you can. That's the easy part. Now for the hard part.
What you really want to know is:
Our goal here is to answer the first two questions. Because we don't know anything about your case, we can't answer the third. But we can—and will—give you some guidelines to consider as you decide whether to pursue your potential legal malpractice claim.
In the simplest terms, legal malpractice happens when a lawyer's negligence causes you to suffer an injury. While that sounds simple, there's actually quite a bit to unpack.
To prove any legal malpractice claim, you must establish these four elements.
Every state puts a deadline—called a statute of limitations—on the time you have to file a legal malpractice lawsuit in court. While the limitation period can vary from one state to the next, two or three years from the date you discover the malpractice is common. Note that many states have a special statute of limitations for malpractice claims, one that's different from the deadline for personal injury claims generally. Make sure you're looking at the correct law.
Statutes of limitations have one job: To kill legal claims that aren't filed in time. Miss the deadline and, absent an exception, your malpractice claim is legally dead. If you file in court after the limitation period runs out, the defendant (the lawyer you've sued) will ask the court to dismiss your case. The court will have no choice but to grant that request. You've lost the right to recover compensation for your injuries.
Statutes of limitations can be among the most complicated and confusing of all laws. When you're not sure how much time you have to file a malpractice lawsuit, speak to a lawyer right away. Time is the enemy of your claim.
Proving malpractice of any kind—legal or otherwise—isn't easy. Truth be told, you probably don't know whether your lawyer was negligent. To show legal negligence, you'll need an expert witness to help prove your case.
An expert witness is a person who's qualified, by education, training, or experience, to testify regarding matters that are beyond the usual knowledge of judges and jurors. In a typical legal malpractice case, you'll need an expert to testify to both liability—duty and breach of duty—and causation. Your expert is likely to be a well-established and experienced practicing lawyer, or maybe a law professor.
It's up to the judge in your case to decide whether your expert is qualified to testify and, if so, the subjects on which they can offer opinions. The defendant will almost certainly challenge their credentials and ask the judge to prohibit them from testifying. Of course, that door swings both ways: The defendant will need an expert witness to counter yours, and your attorney will test that expert's qualifications, too.
One of the things that makes a legal malpractice case tricky is that it's really a case within a case. First, you have to prove you had a viable legal claim. Then you have to show you lost that claim, or part of it, because of your lawyer's malpractice.
In practical terms, to win a legal malpractice case in most states, you must prove that:
Here's a quick example. While walking across the street with a proper crossing signal, Steve was hit by a car. Had Steve's injury case gone to trial, a witness would have testified that Steve was crossing with the signal, and a police report would've corroborated that testimony. Steve's medical records, along with testimony from his treating doctor, would have shown his injuries. Finally, assume that the driver had enough car insurance to pay for Steve's damages.
Steve hired a lawyer, Doe, who filed the lawsuit after the statute of limitations ran out. As a result, the judge threw Steve's case out of court.
Steve sues Doe for legal malpractice. Can he prove his case? Yes.
Unfortunately, that's a question we can't answer. It all comes down to the facts of your underlying case and the strength of your legal malpractice claim.
In general, here are some of the questions you'll want to consider. You should have an experienced lawyer guide you through that analysis.
Pay close attention to your damages. A legal malpractice case is likely to be quite expensive, mostly because of the need for expert testimony. Experts don't come cheap, often charging several hundred dollars per hour. An expert will have to review your entire file—including the underlying case file—prepare a written report, testify in a deposition, and probably travel to the place of your malpractice trial to testify in court.
Those hours add up quickly. As a rule of thumb, count on a bill of at least $10,000 for each expert witness who testifies in court.
If you have a strong malpractice case, your malpractice lawyer will advance that cost (and other case expenses, which can run into thousands of dollars) and will deduct it from your settlement or jury verdict. But your case needs to have enough value to cover those costs plus the attorney's fees, and leave enough to make it worth your time and trouble.
Remember that a legal malpractice claim is a case within a case. If you win, you can recover:
Most often, you'll be awarded what the law calls compensatory damages. Let's return to our example involving Steve to illustrate.
For his underlying personal injury damages, Steve would have been entitled to:
In addition, Steve can collect the damages caused by Doe's malpractice. For example, he's entitled to damages for the emotional distress caused by Doe's wrongdoing. Calculating malpractice damages can be difficult and likely will depend on your state law. Speak to an experienced legal malpractice lawyer about the specifics of your case.
Remember what we mentioned above: A bad or disappointing outcome doesn't always equal legal malpractice. Sometimes, the things that make you mad at your lawyer are just part of the ebb and flow of a legal claim.
Here are some common complaints clients have about their lawyers, along with a brief analysis of whether the lawyer's action (or inaction) amounts to malpractice.
Whether this is legal malpractice depends—at least in part—on why your lawyer quits working, and when they tell you what's going on. For example, if your lawyer is diagnosed with a debilitating illness or suffers a serious injury and they promptly let you know so you can find new counsel, there's probably no malpractice.
But if the lawyer just blows off your matter because they've got better cases to work on, you might have a viable claim if you can prove damages. The longer the attorney ignores you and your case, the more likely it is to amount to malpractice.
These are the facts of Steve's hypothetical case, above. The difficulty will be proving not only that your lawyer mishandled the case, but that if handled correctly, you could have won and collected a judgment.
Suppose your lawyer recommends you settle for far less than their original estimated case value. While you might have good reason for being disappointed, getting case value wrong probably isn't malpractice. What your case is worth depends on a lot of factors, and those factors can change over time as your lawyer finds out more about your claims and the other side's defenses.
If you're worried about legal malpractice, get a second opinion before taking the low settlement offer.
This is malpractice. Your lawyer can't agree to a settlement without your approval. But keep in mind the damages issue. If the lawyer settled for what your case was really worth—or something close to it—it might not make sense to pursue a legal malpractice claim.
This almost certainly isn't malpractice. There's nothing wrong with opposing attorneys playing tennis, bridge, or golf, or enjoying other common social interactions. In fact, those encounters might lead to settlement.
The answer could be different if, during a social event, your lawyer discloses confidential information that hurts the value of your case. That's a violation of the lawyer's ethical obligations and can be the basis for a malpractice case.
Say your lawyer misuses money you paid as a retainer, or takes money from your settlement over and above their case fees and expenses. In the simplest terms, that's stealing client funds. Not only is it legal malpractice, it's also such a serious ethical violation that it's likely grounds for suspension of the lawyer's license or disbarment.
If you suspect your lawyer has misused funds, complain to your state bar association or other attorney regulatory agency. Most states have a client reimbursement fund that will cover losses like these, at least in part. In addition, hire a lawyer to investigate and handle your legal malpractice case.
In case it's not already clear, a legal malpractice case isn't something you want to handle on your own. The defendant and their malpractice insurer will probably put up a real fight. Without experienced counsel on your side, you'll soon be in over your head.
You won't get a second bite at the legal malpractice apple. To get the best result, here's how to find a lawyer who's right for your case.