Landlord's Duty to Rerent When a Tenant Breaks a Lease

Landlord’s Duty to Rerent

State

Legal authority

Must make reasonable efforts to rerent

Has no duty to look for or rent to a new tenant

Law is unclear or courts are divided on the issue

Alabama

Ala. Code §§ 35-9A-105, 35-9A-423

X

Alaska

Alaska Stat. § 34.03.230(c)

X

Arizona

Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 33-1370

X

Arkansas

Weingarten/Arkansas, Inc. v. ABC Interstate Theatres, Inc., 811 S.W.2d 295 (Ark. 1991)

X

California

Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1951.2, 1951.4

X

Colorado

Schneiker v. Gordon, 732 P.2d 603 (Colo. 1987)

X²

Connecticut

Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 47a-11a

X

Delaware

Del. Code Ann. tit. 25, § 5507(d)(2)

X

District of

Columbia

D.C. Code Ann. § 42-3505.52

Florida

Fla. Stat. Ann. § 83.595

X³

Georgia

Ga. Code Ann. § 44-7-34; Peterson v. Midas Realty Corp., 287 S.E.2d 61 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)

X

Hawaii

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 521-70(d)

X

Idaho

Consol. Ag v. Rangen, Inc., 128 Idaho 228 (Idaho 1996)

X

Illinois

735 Ill. Comp. Stat. § 5/9-213.1

X

Indiana

Nylen v. Park Doral Apartments, 535 N.E.2d. 178 (Ind. Ct. App. 1989)

X

Iowa

Iowa Code § 562A.29(3)

X

Kansas

Kan. Stat. Ann. § 58-2565(c)

X

Kentucky

Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 383.670

X

Louisiana

La. Civ. Code Ann. Art. 2002; Gray v. Kanavel, 508 So.2d 970 (La. Ct. App. 1987)

X⁵

X

Maine

Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 14, § 6010-A

X

Maryland

Md. Code Ann. [Real Prop.], § 8-207

Massachusetts

Edmands v. Rust & Richardson Drug Co., 191 Mass. 123, 128 (1906) and assorted other cases

X

Michigan

Fox v. Roethlisberger, 85 N.W.2d 73 (Mich. 1957)

X

Minnesota

Control Data Corp. v. Metro Office Parks Co., 296 Minn. 302 (Minn. 1973)

X

Mississippi

Alsup v. Banks, 9 So. 895 (Miss. 1891)

X⁷

Missouri

Rhoden Inv. Co. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 499 S.W.2d 375 (Mo. 1973); Mo. Rev. Stat. § 535.300

X⁸

Montana

Mont. Code Ann. § 70-24-426

X

Nebraska

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 76-1432

X

Nevada

Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 118.175

X

New

Hampshire

Wen v. Arlen’s, Inc., 103 A.2d 86 (N.H. 1954); Modular Mfg., Inc. v. Dernham Co., 65 B.R. 856 (Bankr. D. N.H. 1986)

X

New Jersey

Sommer v. Kridel, 378 A.2d 767 (N.J. 1977)

X

New Mexico

N.M. Stat. Ann. § 47-8-6

X

New York

N.Y. Real Prop Law § 227-e

North Carolina

Isbey v. Crews, 284 S.E.2d 534 (N.C. Ct. App. 1981)

X

North Dakota

N.D. Cent. Code § 47-16-13.5

X

Ohio

Stern v. Taft, 361 N.E.2d 279 (Ct. App. 1976)

X⁹

Oklahoma

Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 41, § 129

X

Oregon

Or. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 90.410

X

Pennsylvania

Stonehedge Square Ltd. P’ship v. Movie Merchs., 715 A.2d 1082 (Pa. 1998)

X

Rhode Island

R.I. Gen. Laws § 34-18-40

X

South Carolina

S.C. Code Ann. § 27-40-730 (c)

X

South Dakota

No cases or statutes in South Dakota discuss this issue.

X

Tennessee

Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-507 (c)

X¹⁰

Texas

Tex. Prop. Code Ann. § 91.006

X

Utah

Utah Code Ann. § 78B-6-816; Reid v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co., 776 P.2d 896 (Utah 1989)

X

Vermont

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 9, § 4462

X

Virginia

Va. Code Ann. § 55.1-1251

X

Washington

Wash. Rev. Code Ann. § 59.18.310

X¹¹

West Virginia

W.Va. Code § 37-6-7; Teller v. McCoy, 253 S.E.2d 114 (W.Va. 1978)

X

Wisconsin

Wis. Stat. Ann. § 704.29

X

Wyoming

Goodwin v. Upper Crust, Inc., 624 P.2d 1192 (1981)

X

¹ Landlord may continue lease in effect after tenant's breach and abandonment and recover rent as it becomes due, if the lease gave the tenant the right to sublet or assign, subject only to reasonable limitations. (Cal. Civ Code 1951.4.) (California)

² Case law is not dispositive, but state practice seems to require (Colorado)

³ Landlord has the option of rerenting, standing by and doing nothing (tenant remains liable for rent as it comes due), or invoking its right to a liquidated damages, or early termination, provision. Latter remedy is available only if the lease includes a liquidated damages addendum, or addition, that provides for no more than two months’ damages and requires tenant to give no more than 60 days’ notice. Liquidated damages provision must substantially include specified language in Fl. Stat. Ann. § 83.595. (Florida)

⁴ Ga. Code Ann. § 44-7-34 states that nothing precludes landlords from retaining the security deposit for rent and other damages provided the landlord attempts to mitigate the actual damages. However, a Georgia court has held that a landlord could keep the rental vacant and sue for rent as it becomes due in spite of this statute. (Kimber v. Towne Hills Dev. Co., 274 S.E.2d 620 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980).) (Georgia)

⁵ Court decisions are uniform although more recent decisions appear to require mitigation. (Louisiana)

⁶ Although case law seems to accept a duty to mitigate, there is no definitive statement of the law and the issue remains unsettled. (Massachusetts)

⁷ Many Miss. attorneys believe this old case is not sound authority, and that a trial judge would find a duty to mitigate in spite of it. (Mississippi)

⁸ Landlord must mitigate only if intending to use tenant’s security deposit to cover future unpaid rent. (Missouri)

⁹ Duty to mitigate applies in absence of any clause that purports to relieve the landlord of this duty (courts must enforce this clause). (Ohio)

¹⁰ Applies only to counties having a population of more than 75,000, according to the 2010 federal census or any subsequent federal census. (See Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-28-102). (Tennessee)

¹¹ Detailed procedures must be followed when premises are vacant due to tenant’s death. (See Wash. Rev. Code Ann. § 59.18.595.) (Washington)