The federal Fair Housing Act of 1968 and the federal Fair Housing Act Amendments Act of 1988 prohibit discrimination on the basis of the following criteria (called “protected categories”): race or color; religion; national origin; familial status or age—includes families with children under the age of 18 and pregnant women; disability or handicap, or sex.
The federal Fair Housing Acts apply to all aspects of the landlord-tenant relationship. A landlord may not:
Federal antidiscrimination laws are admininstered by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and you can file a fair housing complaint there. If you want to read the text of federal discrimination law, see 42 United States Code Sections 3601-3619 and 3631. Find federal laws by going to the Library of Congress's legal research site.
Overt discrimination against persons of a certain race or religion (“No blacks allowed”) is unusual but, incredibly, does still occur. Far more common is subtle discrimination that is accomplished by indirect methods. For example, the landlord who turns away every black applicant is discriminating just as much as the one who announces that none need apply. And an apartment ad that says “safe Christian community” violates federal law, since applicants might reasonably conclude that Christians are preferred as tenants.
Discrimination based on national origin is illegal, whether it’s deliberate or carried out indirectly. For instance, an ad that offers special discounts to members of the Italian-American Club would be a likely candidate for a discrimination charge. And landlords cannot require proof of citizenship or immigration papers from applicants of one ethnicity but not from others, since doing so places a burden on one group that is not imposed on everyone else. And in California, it's illegal to ask any applicant or tenant about immigration or citizenship status.
Landlords are not allowed to explicitly or indirectly turn you away based on your family status or your age.
While some landlords don’t like renting to tenants with children, fearing the noise and wear and tear that kids might cause, the federal Fair Housing Acts prohibit discriminating on this basis. A landlord may not legally turn away or evict a tenant because he or she has children or because an applicant or tenant is pregnant. Even if the landlord has a worthy motive, such as believing that children won’t be safe in the building or the neighborhood, it is illegal to deny the tenancy on that basis or to make other discriminatory moves such as steering families to certain parts of the property (usually the back).
Some landlords try to get around the laws prohibiting discrimination against families by setting unreasonably low occupancy limits, such as only two people for a two-bedroom unit. This too is illegal, as it has the effect of excluding families. Federal law (in this case, an opinion letter written by the Department of Housing and Urban Development) has established minimum occupancy standards that regulate how low an occupancy can go and still be legal. In general, landlords must allow at least two persons per bedroom. Landlords can be more restrictive only in rare instances, when they can show that legitimate business reasons justify a more restrictive standard. For example, a policy of only three persons in a two-bedroom unit might pass muster if the landlord can prove it is truly based on the limitations of the plumbing system or some other aspect of the building’s infrastructure.
The federal Fair Housing Acts do not expressly ban discrimination based on age. Nevertheless, it is definitely forbidden under the broader prohibition against discrimination on the basis of familial status.
A landlord cannot refuse to rent to an older person or impose special terms and conditions on the tenancy unless these same standards are applied to everyone else. If you have excellent references and credit history, a landlord has no legal basis for refusing you, even if you are 85 and rely to some degree on the regular assistance of a nearby adult child or friend. (Of course, a landlord could legally give the rental to someone else with equal or better references or financial stability.) However, if your current landlord reveals that you suffer from advanced senility to the point that you often wander into the wrong apartment, frequently forget to pay the rent, or are unable to undertake basic housekeeping chores, the prospective landlord can refuse to rent to you based on this age-neutral evidence that you are not likely to be a stable, reliable tenant.
Federal law prohibits discrimination against people who:
If you had, have, or appear to have mental or emotional impairments, you must be evaluated and treated by the landlord on the basis of your financial stability and history as a tenant, not on the basis of your mental health. If you cannot meet the good-tenant criteria that the landlord applies to all applicants (such as good references from previous landlords and no prior evictions), you may be rejected on that basis.
Landlords are not allowed to ask you whether you have a disability or illness, or ask to see medical records. And no matter how well intentioned, the landlord cannot make decisions about where and how you will live on the property that he would not make were you not disabled. For example, if there are two units for rent—one on the ground floor and one three stories up—the landlord must show both units to a wheelchair-bound applicant unless the applicant asks to see only one.
Federal law protects disabled tenants after they have moved into a rental unit as well as during the application process. Landlords must reasonably accommodate the needs of disabled tenants, at the landlord’s own expense. This means that a disabled tenant can expect the landlord to adjust rules, procedures, or services to a reasonable degree in order to provide an equal opportunity to use and enjoy her dwelling unit or a common space. Examples include providing a parking space for a movement-impaired tenant and accepting a guide or service animal in an otherwise “no pets” building.
However, landlords need not undertake changes that would seriously impair their ability to run their business, such as installing an elevator to the third floor to accommodate a wheelchair-bound tenant’s wish to live there.
Fortunately, where a landlord’s legal duty to reasonably accommodate the needs of a disabled tenant ends, his obligation to allow the tenant to modify the living space may begin. Disabled tenants have the right to modify their living space, at the tenant’s expense, to the extent necessary to make the space safe and comfortable. There are two caveats to this rule: First, the landlord is not required to allow you to make major structural alterations. Second, if the modifications will make the unit unacceptable to the next tenant, the disabled tenant must agree to undo the modification when moving out. The landlord has the right to insist that the tenant put money in an escrow account to cover the eventual cost of returning the unit to its original condition. Examples of modifications undertaken by a disabled tenant include the lowering of countertops, installation of a ramp, or repositioning the light switches.
Landlords are entitled to ask for proof that the accommodation or modification you have requested will address your situation—without it, your landlord has no way of knowing whether your request is legitimate or a ruse to obtain special treatment. Ask your physician, therapist, counselor, or any other third-party professional who knows you and understands your situation for a letter attesting that what you are asking for will meet your needs. To protect your privacy, explain to the physician or other writer that there’s no need to explain the disability. The writer need only certify that you are under his or her care and that the changes you would like are appropriate to your situation.
Federal fair housing law extends limited protection to two carefully defined groups:
It is important to remember that, despite these protections, other aspects of a recovering alcoholic’s (or a former drug addict’s) past might legally serve as the basis for a denial of housing. For example, if you are a recovering alcoholic who has bad credit, a spotty employment history, or negative references from your previous landlords, a landlord may reject you for these reasons just as readily as any other applicant with these flaws. What a landlord cannot do is reject a prospective tenant solely on the basis of his status as a former addict or recovering alcoholic.
You cannot be denied a place to live (or have special rules imposed on you) solely because you’re female or male. Even well-intentioned policies are off-limits—for example, fearful that single women are more likely to be burglarized and assaulted than male tenants, a landlord cannot require single females to live in upper-story apartments, even if, in fact, those units are less prone to break-ins.
Sexual harassment is another form of unlawful sexual discrimination. For example, it’s illegal to refuse to rent to a person who resists the landlord’s sexual advances or to make life difficult for a tenant who has resisted such advances.
Unfortunately, not every rental is covered by the federal fair housing laws. The following types of property are exempt:
Fortunately for some tenants, however, many state fair housing laws cover properties or situations that are exempt under federal law. For example, owner-occupied buildings with four or fewer rental units are exempt under federal law but are protected under California law. Check your state fair housing agency for details.