On April 20, 2010, a well blowout led to an explosion aboard the BP-leased Deepwater Horizon drilling platform in the Gulf of Mexico. Eleven human lives were lost, along with the drilling rig. What followed was one of the worst environmental disasters in United States history. More than 200 million gallons of crude oil poured into the Gulf for almost three months before the well could be capped.
In September 2014, the federal court overseeing lawsuits against BP and others found that BP was 67% responsible for the blowout, explosion, and spill. Transocean, the rig's owner, was found 30% to blame. The remaining 3% of fault was attributed to Halliburton, a contractor. ("Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law - Phase Two Trial," at ¶ 9, In re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig "Deepwater Horizon" in the Gulf of Mexico on April 20, 2010 (Jan. 15, 2015).)
What's the present status of the lawsuits? What claims against BP and the other responsible parties have been settled, and what claims are ongoing? We begin with a review of the case history, along with a brief summary of the settlements that have been finalized. From there, we'll discuss the outstanding claims and explain where the case is headed.
Unsurprisingly, lawsuits began pouring into federal and state courts within days of the disaster. In a mass tort case like this, it's common practice to consolidate cases into what's known as "multidistrict litigation." On August 10, 2010, 77 then-pending federal suits were consolidated in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana in Multidistrict Litigation 2179: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig "Deepwater Horizon." Judge Carl J. Barbier is presiding over the MDL.
Multidistrict litigation (MDL) is a way to manage litigation when there are lots of cases involving similar facts and injuries. Cases that qualify are transferred to one federal trial court—in this instance, a federal district court in Louisiana—so that the same judge can preside over pretrial matters like motions, discovery, and preparing cases for trial.
In most MDLs, the court will also conduct one or more "bellwether trials." Representative cases are selected and tried to the court or a jury. The goal is to give the parties and their lawyers a better idea of how the remaining cases will play out, hoping that they'll settle without the need for trials.
According to the court, the MDL has involved in excess of 3,000 lawsuits and more than 100,000 claims. ("Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law," In re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig "Deepwater Horizon" in the Gulf of Mexico, 148 F.Supp. 3d 563, 566 (E.D. La. 2015).) For ease of discussion, we can group the claims into these three categories:
Environmental claims. The United States, impacted Gulf states (Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida), and more than 400 localities brought claims for the costs of environmental cleanup and remediation. The scope of the damage was staggering. Oil slicks covered 43,000 square miles in the Gulf. More than 1,300 miles of coastline and 400 square miles of sea floor were covered in gobs of oil, much of it mixed with toxic chemical dispersants.
According to the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration the spill resulted in the loss of:
Economic loss claims. State and local economies across the Gulf region were devastated by the spill. Businesses and workers in the commercial fishing, shrimp, oyster and other seafood industries saw their livelihoods threatened by the spill. So did charter boat operators, hotels, tourist attractions, rental property owners, and other businesses in popular resort and coastal areas.
Personal injury and medical benefits claims. Given the sheer size of the spill, containment and cleanup was a massive undertaking that involved tens of thousands of contractors and workers. They were exposed to crude oil—containing, among other things, volatile organic compounds like benzene, xylene, toluene, and hydrogen sulfide—and a dispersing (cleanup) product called Corexit.
Within a short time after the cleanup started, workers began to report health problems. Common complaints included:
The environmental and economic loss claims have settled. The parties also agreed to settle the personal injury and medical benefit claims, but—as discussed below—thousands of those claims are still being fought over in court.
In April 2016, BP agreed to settle the environmental claims for $20.8 billion, the largest environmental damage settlement in the nation's history. This settlement included:
Separately, BP paid $4 billion in criminal fines and penalties, including $2.4 billion to restore damaged natural resources.
Finally, other responsible parties also resolved claims brought against them. For example, Transocean pled guilty to violating the federal Clean Water Act and paid a $400 million criminal fine, in addition to a $1 billion civil penalty.
In 2012, BP agreed to settle with individuals and businesses that experienced economic and property damage losses. The settlement agreement covered:
For most losses, the agreement didn't cap BP's financial liability, and multiple claims were allowed. The claim filing deadline was June 8, 2015.
In May 2012, BP agreed to settle the personal injury and medical benefits (PIMB) claims. The PIMB settlement class was to include all persons who:
This settlement was supposed to streamline the claim process for all PIMB settlement class members who were exposed to oil or Corexit and who suffered health problems. Those with less serious medical issues could file a claim accompanied by an affidavit and documentation, and would receive a minimum of $900 (for property owners) or $1,300 (for cleanup workers). Roughly 18,000 PIMB settlement class members were paid these minimum amounts.
For those with more serious health problems, bigger payments—$60,000 or more—were supposed to be available. But of 23,000 PIMB settlement class members who applied for larger awards, only 40 were successful. Claim administrators rejected nearly all of their claims because claimants couldn't prove that their medical issues were caused by exposures to specific chemicals, a legal element known as "causation."
Many PIMB settlement class members' illnesses took a long time to appear. The parties, as part of their settlement, anticipated these "later-manifested physical conditions" (LMPC). But the parties disagreed over whether these LMPCs were included in the PIMB settlement. The PIMB settlement class members and their lawyers argued the delay in onset didn't matter: They were entitled to submit settlement claims for LMPCs the same as claimants whose illnesses appeared right away.
BP objected, saying anyone who wasn't diagnosed with a specified condition on or before April 16, 2012 was excluded from the settlement. Judge Barbier reluctantly agreed with BP. As a result, PIMB settlement class members with cleanup-related medical conditions diagnosed after April 16, 2012 can't file a settlement claim.
To get compensation, PIMB settlement class members with a LMPC must go back to court and file a second lawsuit. Thousands of new cases have been filed, and more are expected. As discussed below, nearly all the lawsuits have failed.
Why would a lawsuit settlement require PIMB settlement class members to file yet another lawsuit? Lawyers representing them claim the settlement agreement contains a drafting error. BP, they argue, is benefitting from a mutual mistake that's costing injured workers and property owners much needed injury payments and medical benefits. BP denies any error.
BP's lawyers are vigorously (and successfully) defending these LMPC lawsuits. Among other things, BP's experts have argued that to prove causation, the plaintiff (the party filing suit) must show precisely what chemicals they were exposed to, and in what amounts. Lawyers for the PIMB settlement class members have answered that this standard creates an impossible burden of proof, one that simply can't be met.
Judges hearing LMPC lawsuits have agreed with BP, leaving settlement class members empty handed. Of about 4,800 lawsuits seeking LMPC compensation, nearly all have been thrown out of court for lack of causation. Only one injured worker—a boat captain who did cleanup work—has received a settlement after filing a LMPC case.
As of August 2024, the environmental and economic loss claims are resolved. Unfortunately, the same can't be said for the personal injury and medical benefits claims. Many PIMB settlement class members whose LMPC lawsuits were thrown out of court for lack of causation have appealed those dismissals to United States courts of appeals. Those appeals are ongoing.
Lawyers continue to accept new LMPC cases. If you think you have a LMPC and are considering a case, you should speak to an attorney right away. Before you can file in court, you must submit a Notice of Intent to Sue. The deadline to file this notice is probably four years from the date your LMPC was first diagnosed. You'll need experienced legal help in your corner to navigate the maze of rules and procedures involved.
Don't expect a quick resolution to your case if you choose to file suit. As discussed above, a key causation issue has nearly all LMPC lawsuits stalled in federal appeals courts. If that issue is resolved in favor of the plaintiffs (a process that's likely to take some time), the lawsuits can move forward. If the appeals courts decide causation in BP's favor, that likely means the end of those claims. Speak to your lawyer for advice specific to your case.
Today, almost 15 years after the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster, the legal fallout continues. Federal, state, and local governments have been paid. So, too, have the people and businesses who suffered economic and financial losses.
If you're among the thousands who answered the call for cleanup help in good faith, only to be turned away when you got sick and needed a helping hand, you might be angry and frustrated. Those feelings are understandable. The legal outcome, frankly, remains uncertain. But experienced lawyers are willing to speak with you and, if you have a viable case, to fight on your behalf.
When you decide it's time to move forward, here's how you can find an attorney who's right for you.