In theory, choosing a domain name is simple. If it is memorable, pronounceable, short, clever, easily spelled and suggests the nature of the commerce on your website, you've got yourself a winner. But even if your choice is brilliant from a marketing standpoint, it may not be so smart from a legal perspective.
If you choose a domain name that conflicts with any one of the millions of commercial names that already exist, you risk losing it. And if you've put money and sweat into marketing your website and then are forced to give the domain name up, your Web-based business is likely to suffer a damaging, if not fatal, blow.
The rules for understanding whether a legal conflict exists comes from trademark law. Here are the basics you need to understand:
Applying these principles to your domain name selection, you are at risk of losing your chosen domain name if the owner of an existing trademark convinces a judge or arbitrator that your use of the domain name makes it likely that customers would be confused as to the source or quality of the products.
Sometimes similar domain names can cause customers to buy different goods or services than what they intended to buy. For instance, suppose, on the recommendation of a friend, you decide to purchase Lee's famous Flamebrain barbecue sauce, which is sold only on the Web. You intend to type "flamebrain.com" into your browser but accidentally enter "flamerbrain.com" instead. You get a website run by Henry, who has both copied Lee's idea to offer a barbecue sauce for sale on the Web and, with a very minor variation, the name of Lee's sauce. You order two bottles, completely unaware that you ordered the wrong product from the wrong website. You get a barbecue sauce that is much inferior to Lee's famous sauce.
Customer confusion matters only if a domain name that's similar to the one you want to use is a protected trademark. To be protected, a trademark must be distinctive. A name may be distinctive because it is made up (chumbo.com for an online software store), arbitrary in the context of its use (apple.com for computer products), fanciful (ragingbull.com for investment advice) or suggestive of the underlying product or service (salon.com for an online magazine). If a domain name uses surnames, geographic names or common words that describe some aspect of the goods or services sold on the website (healthanswers.com for online health information) it is ineligible for trademark protection unless the owner can demonstrate distinction through substantial sales and advertising. If the trademark owner has been able to register a name with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, it is probably distinctive.
Many domain names -- for instance, coffee.com, drugs.com and business.com -- are potentially powerful domain names, but they're generic. That is, they describe whole categories of products or services. Generic terms can never be trademarks.
To learn more, see Nolo's FAQ on Qualifying for Trademark Protection.
The way to choose a domain name that satisfies your own marketing needs and doesn't get in the way of anybody else's trademark rights is to search as many existing trademarks as possible, spot possible conflicts and then pick a name that's unlikely to generate a nasty lawyer's letter.
The first place to go for possible conflicts is the trademark database of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office at www.uspto.gov. Searching this database gives you all registered trademarks and all trademarks for which registration is pending. You should search not only for your proposed mark but also for other marks that are logically close, such as synonyms and variant spellings, such as barbeque and barbecue. In addition, you should also search the Internet at large and any business name registers, such as Thomas Register Online at www.thomasregister.com. (For more information about trademark searching, see Conducting a Trademark Search.
If your search turns up any names that are the same or similar to your proposed domain name, ask these questions:
If the answers to all these questions are no, you can feel reasonably free to go ahead and use your domain name without fear of creating a legal conflict. If you answer yes to any of them, there will be some risk of a legal challenge down the road. If you aren't sure, take an informal poll of friends. Would they be confused by the simultaneous use of the two names? Might they end up on the wrong website? Another option is to run the possible conflicts by a trademark attorney. Although you can anticipate that the attorney will be more conservative than is actually necessary, you still may benefit from having a trained eye go over your circumstances. For more information about trademarks, see Enforcing Your Trademark Rights.)
Sometimes a powerful company tries to force a smaller one to give up a domain name that was legally acquired in good faith by the smaller company. Because trademark conflicts are ultimately resolved in court, a business that can easily afford to pay lawyers is in a powerful position to sue the smaller company for trademark infringement (assuming there is any basis for doing so, which there usually is). When the smaller company realizes that it will cost tens of thousands of dollars to defend the suit, the big guy proposes a settlement under which the small company parts with the name for a relatively meager sum. In other words, the powerful company ends up getting what it wants simply because the court system is manifestly unfair to those who can't afford attorneys.
There are strategies to fight this sort of bullying. If the small company has the resources, of course, it can mount a defense and actually win. In addition, the Internet community has been extremely hostile to online bullies, and out-of-court campaigns sometimes make them back down. For more on this issue, visit the Domain Name Rights Coalition at www.domainnamerights.org