A Guide to Arizona Slip and Fall Claims and Lawsuits

"Do I have an Arizona slip and fall case?"

If that question—or something like it—is what brought you here, you're in the right place.

Most slip and fall (and trip and fall) cases are grounded in the law of negligence. Negligence is simply a failure to act as carefully as required by the circumstances. What does that mean in a slip and fall case? It means that landowners have a legal duty to make their property reasonably safe for known or foreseeable visitors. But as we'll see, duty is a two-way street. Visitors also have a legal duty to look out for their own safety.

We start with the elements of an Arizona slip and fall claim, focusing most of our attention on the issue of fault—who's legally responsible for your injuries. We'll also touch on the statute of limitations, defenses the landowner might raise, and more.

The Elements of an Arizona Slip and Fall Case

To prove an Arizona slip and fall or trip and fall claim, you must show that:

• the landowner owed you a duty of care
• the landowner breached, or failed to meet, that duty of care
• you suffered an injury, and
• your injury was caused by the landowner's failure to meet the duty of care.

The first two elements—duty of care and breach of that duty—are what the law calls negligence. In a typical case, legal responsibility comes down to whose negligence caused the accident. Most often, you point the finger at the defendant (the party you're suing), and the defendant turns around and points right back at you.

(Learn more about slip and fall claims on government property, at a business, and at a private residence.)

Who Can Be Responsible for a Slip and Fall Claim?

Anyone who owns or controls a property can be liable (legally responsible) for a slip and fall injury. Landowners, tenants, contractors, property managers, and easement owners, among others—for the sake of convenience, we'll call them all "owners" or "landowners"—must take reasonable care in managing and maintaining property they own or control.

Your lawyer will identify and pursue all potentially responsible parties, provided they have insurance or other assets to cover your damages. In most cases, they'll fight among themselves to figure out who has to pay you.

What Is a Duty of Care?

The duty of care is a legal standard—a rule that explains what a landowner should do to make their property safe for visitors. It's a way of saying to a landowner: "This is the least you must do to avoid legal responsibility for injuries that happen on your property." It's up to the judge to decide whether a duty of care exists.

In Arizona slip and fall cases, a duty of care arises when:

• there's a dangerous condition on the property that poses an unreasonable risk of harm to others, and
• the landowner knows (or in some cases, the landowner should know) about the danger.

Relationships Define the Duty of Care

Under Arizona law, a landowner's duty of care usually depends on the relationship, if any, between the landowner and the visitor. Arizona premises liability law—the legal rules covering (among other things) slip and fall claims—recognizes three categories of visitors: Trespassers, invitees, and licensees.

Trespassers. A trespasser is someone who's on a property without permission, or after permission to be there expired or was revoked.

Duty owed to trespassers. As a general rule, Arizona landowners have only a limited duty of care to trespassers. They must refrain from willful or wanton misconduct, meaning intentional wrongdoing that ignores a risk of harm or that's meant to cause harm. Simple negligence, by itself, usually won't result in liability. (See Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-557 (2024).)

Like many states, though, Arizona has carved out a couple of exceptions to this limited duty rule. First, a landowner who knows that trespassers regularly enter their land must warn them about known dangers. But there's no duty to inspect for hidden hazards.

Second, Arizona has a special rule to protect child trespassers. The state's "attractive nuisance" rule makes a landowner liable for injuries to children who are drawn to a property by a condition that kids often find irresistible. Examples include things like swimming pools, trampolines, and abandoned vehicles. When a property presents an attractive nuisance and the landowner knows (or should know) that kids trespass there, the landowner must take reasonable steps—fencing the property, for instance—to keep trespassing children safe.

Invitees. An invitee (also known as a "business invitee") enters a property with the owner's permission. Both the invitee and the landowner might benefit from the invitee's presence. But the landowner derives a financial or other valuable benefit from an invitee's visit. Store customers, for example, are invitees. So are patients at a medical building, hotel guests, and nightclub patrons.

Duty owed to invitees. The highest duty of care is owed to invitees. When an owner has actual or constructive notice of a dangerous condition creating an unreasonable risk of harm that's unknown to an invitee, the landowner must exercise reasonable care for the invitee's safety. Reasonable care requires the landowner to either warn of the condition or fix it.

Constructive notice means the condition was there for a long enough time that the owner should have discovered it, had they made a reasonable effort to inspect the property. In other words, landowners have a duty to inspect their property to discover hazards, and must warn invitees about the danger or take steps to fix the condition.

A landowner probably isn't responsible for an invitee's injury when the invitee knows of a dangerous condition, either because it's open and obvious (discussed below) or the owner warned of it. But if the landowner knows there's a risk of harm to an invitee even though the danger is obvious, the landowner might still have a duty to act for the invitee's safety.

Licensees. You're a licensee when you come to a property with the owner's permission, but for a purpose that mostly benefits you. Someone who hunts or fishes on land with the owner's permission, for instance, is a licensee. Social guests, appliance repair technicians, and delivery people are licensees, too.

Duty owed to licensees. As with trespassers, landowners must avoid willfully or wantonly causing injury to a licensee. Also, an owner who has actual knowledge of a dangerous condition posing an unreasonable risk of harm that's unknown to a licensee must either warn about the danger or remedy it. A landowner probably isn't responsible for injuries resulting from known or obvious dangers.

Dangerous Conditions and Landowner Notice

To prove that a landowner was negligent, you start by showing there was a dangerous condition on the property that created an unreasonable risk of harm. Next, you must show that the landowner knew (or in the case of invitees, knew or should have known) about the danger.

Examples of dangerous conditions. Here are some examples of dangerous property conditions that often create an unreasonable risk of harm:

• uneven surfaces caused, for example, by something like a crack or break in the pavement or walk
• loose or easily movable surface material such as gravel, rocks, or sand
• wet, slushy, snowy, or icy walkways
• stair runs or risers that are larger or smaller than what's typically required by building or safety codes
• torn, frayed, or unsecured carpets or rugs
• accumulations—natural or artificial—of water, snow, or ice
• foreign substances like liquids, foods, or other slipping or tripping hazards on floors
• aisles or walkways occupied or partially blocked by product displays
• tools or equipment left in aisles or walkways
• products spilled on store aisles
• inadequate lighting
• missing or defective railings, handrails, or guardrails, and
• things hanging from shelves or ceilings.

The landowner knew of the danger. A landowner can't be expected to warn about or fix dangerous conditions when the landowner isn't aware of them. Proving that the landowner had notice of the condition is critical to a slip and fall claim. Without it, the landowner has no duty of care. In most cases, the landowner will deny having had notice of the danger.

For invitees and licensees, a landowner's actual knowledge of a dangerous condition will suffice. Unless they created the danger, proving what a landowner actually knew can be difficult. Here are examples of the kinds of evidence you might look for.

• Prior incident reports and complaints, documenting earlier encounters with the condition.
• Maintenance records, showing prior efforts to deal with the condition.
• Inspection reports from government agencies, recording prior infractions or safety violations related to the condition.
• Surveillance photos or videos, to prove how the condition came to be and how long it had existed.
• Testimony from others who saw the dangerous condition, to find out what they saw and what, if anything, they reported to the landowner.
• Emails, text messages, and other communications indicating that the dangerous condition was known to the landowner or its agents.
• Testimony from the landowner and the landowner's agents, to find out what they knew about the condition and when they knew it.
• Expert witness testimony, which can help to establish, for example, how long a substance likely had been on the floor before you fell on it.

When an invitee is injured, the landowner's constructive notice of the danger can be enough to establish a duty of care. You'll need to rely on the landowner's constructive knowledge of a dangerous condition when—as often will be the case—the landowner denies having actually known of it.

The key to constructive notice is proving how long the dangerous condition existed before it injured you. From there, you can argue that had the landowner been reasonably careful, they would have inspected the property, discovered the danger, and fixed it or warned you about it.

(Learn more about proving fault for slip and fall accidents.)

Landowner Defenses: Shifting the Blame to You

In addition to lack of notice, landowners can raise a number of defenses to a slip and fall claim. Three of the most common are:

• you were partly or completely to blame for your injuries
• the danger was open and obvious, and
• you assumed the risk of a known hazard.

You Were to Blame

Your own negligence is a defense to the owner's legal responsibility for your injuries. If the accident happened in a contributory fault state, any negligence on your part—even 1% of the total—defeats your claim entirely. When the accident happened in a comparative fault state, your share of the negligence reduces the damages you can collect. Some comparative fault states bar you from collecting any damages if you're mostly to blame for what happened.

Arizona is a "pure" comparative negligence state. In a "pure" comparative negligence state, your percentage share of the fault simply reduces your personal injury damages by that amount. As long as you're not 100% to blame for what happened, you can still collect some damages for your injuries. For example, if an Arizona jury finds that you were 90% at fault for your fall and decides your total damages are $100,000, you can collect $10,000: $100,000 x 10%.

(Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2505 (2024).)

What did you do that was negligent? The defendant will leave no stone unturned looking for ways to blame you for the fall. Here are a few of the most common claims.

• You were on a part of the property where visitors aren't allowed, or aren't expected to be.
• You weren't paying attention to where you were walking.
• You were distracted by a child, or your phone, or something else.
• You were wearing footwear that was inappropriate or even unsafe for the situation.
• You were warned of the dangerous condition, or the owner took reasonable steps to protect visitors.
• The dangerous condition was open and obvious.

Open and Obvious Dangers

In many states, landowners aren't responsible for injuries caused by open and obvious dangers. An open and obvious danger is a condition that's clearly visible and that should be seen by a reasonable person exercising ordinary care for their own safety. Common examples include accumulations of snow or ice, large objects, and darkness.

In Arizona, the fact that a dangerous condition is open and obvious isn't an automatic defense to liability. Visitors must take reasonable steps to protect themselves from open and obvious dangers. But if the landowner knows that visitors might be distracted and not perceive the danger, or if a visitor can't avoid the hazard even with reasonable care, then the landowner still has a duty to warn of the danger or take other steps to minimize the risk of harm.

You Assumed the Risk

When you voluntarily and knowingly assume the risk of a known danger, injuries resulting from that danger ordinarily aren't the responsibility of the landowner. Classic examples include recreational activities like bungee jumping, base jumping, skydiving, and other high-risk adventures.

The Slip and Fall Statute of Limitations

A "statute of limitations" is a law that limits your time to file a lawsuit in court. For most Arizona slip and fall claims, you have two years from the date you were injured to sue. Different rules might apply when:

• you don't know right away you've been hurt
• you were injured on government property
• you were legally disabled (unable to file a lawsuit yourself) at the time you fell, or
• the defendant lives outside of Arizona, or flees the state to avoid being sued.

If you think one of these situations applies to your case or you're not sure how much time you have to file a slip and fall lawsuit, speak to an Arizona personal injury lawyer right away. Miss the filing deadline and, absent an extension that gives you more time to sue, your slip and fall claim is legally dead. You've lost the right to recover damages for your injuries.

(See Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-542 (2024); Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-821.01.A (2024); Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-821 (2024); Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-502 (2024); Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-501 (2024).)

Do You Need a Lawyer for Your Slip and Fall Claim?

To answer that question, ask yourself these questions.

• Are the case facts simple and mostly uncontested? If so, that's a point in favor of giving it a try on your own. On the other hand, when the facts are complicated or murky or the defendant disputes your version of the story, think about hiring legal counsel. A lawyer can help you find and organize the facts into a coherent, compelling narrative that puts you in the best possible light.
• Are there difficult legal issues involved? Here, we're speaking of legal issues that might sink, or do serious damage to, your case. The statute of limitations is a prime example. So is comparative or contributory negligence, as discussed above. Because comparative negligence is almost guaranteed to be in play in a slip and fall case, your best bet will be to have legal help in your corner.

The defendant will be represented by an insurance company and its attorneys. It won't be a fair fight unless you have legal counsel, too. Here's how you can find a lawyer who's right for you.

Arizona Slip and Fall FAQ

Here are some other questions you might have about your slip and fall case.

Where Will Your Slip and Fall Lawsuit Be Filed?

Your lawyer will file your case in the state's main trial court, called the Arizona superior court. Each Arizona county has at least one superior court, and large counties have more than one. The proper "venue," or location for your case, is likely nearest to where the defendant lives or has its main place of business, or where you fell and were injured.

Will Your Case Settle or Will It Go to Trial?

Most personal injury cases settle without a trial. Yours probably will, too, unless the defendant feels confident a jury will find you were mostly to blame, you weren't badly hurt, or your injuries weren't caused by the fall. You should discuss negotiation and settlement strategies with your lawyer.

How Long Will It Take to Resolve Your Case?

That depends. If the facts aren't disputed, it's clear the landowner was to blame, you've gathered the evidence to support your claim, and your injuries and damages are well documented, your case might settle in several weeks to a few months. If it goes to trial, expect the process to take a year or more, and even longer if there's an appeal. A case can settle at any time during trial preparation or trial.

What Kinds of Damages Can You Collect?

If you win your case, you'll recover what the law calls "compensatory damages." These are meant to compensate you for:

• out-of-pocket losses like medical bills, lost wages, and amounts you pay for replacement household services, and
• things that don't come directly out of your pocket, like pain and suffering, emotional distress, and disability.

(Learn more about how insurance companies value injury cases.)

Find Out About Arizona Personal Injury Laws

Your slip and fall claim is a type of personal injury case. You can learn more about the laws we've covered here, as well as other Arizona personal injury laws that could impact your claim.