Nolo was born in 1971 as a publisher of self-help legal books. Guided by the motto “law for all,” our attorney authors and editors have been explaining the law to everyday people ever since. Learn more about our history and our editorial standards.
Each article that we publish has been written or reviewed by one of our editors, who together have over 100 years of experience practicing law. We strive to keep our information current as laws change. Learn more about our editorial standards.
A U.S. Supreme Court case that adopted the "prurient interest" standard as the test for deciding whether material is obscene. Specifically, the test is whether an average person, applying contemporary community standards to the material as a whole, would conclude that the material appeals to prurient (immodest or unwholesome) sexual interests. According to the Court, obscenity has no redeeming social importance and therefore is not entitled to First Amendment free speech protection.
Today, Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973) announces the controlling definition of obscenity. Miller incorporated the Roth prurient interest standard and added additional factors to it.