Winning at a Preliminary Hearing
Most of the time, the defense lies low, questions witnesses, and tries to assess the strength of the prosecution's case. Now and then, the defense wins.
Most of the time, prosecutor's win prelims. Careful prosecutors don't bring cases that might not stand up to the judge's scrutiny. However, the defense might win and the case might be dismissed (or the charges reduced) at the close of a preliminary hearing if:
The eyewitness identification of the defendant does not hold up under cross-examination, and there is no other credible evidence to show that the defendant committed the crime in question. This may cause the whole case against the defendant to unravel, and the judge may readily agree to dismiss the charges (or reduce them to a charge that doesn’t require the eyewitness testimony).
A key prosecution witness fails to show up or becomes reluctant to testify. This might happen if the defendant is a spouse, family member, or friend; and the prelim is being held in a state that requires the witness to attend rather than allowing the police to relate what the witness told them.
The prosecution fails to offer evidence in support of each element of the crime charged. For example, to convict a suspect of grand theft, the prosecution usually must show that (1) the defendant, (2) took and carried away, (3) property with a value of more than $500, (4) belonging to another (person or company), (5) with the intention of depriving that person or company permanently of the property. In the prelim, the prosecution does not have to prove each of these elements beyond a reasonable doubt, but it does have to produce some evidence to substantiate each element. If the prosecution does not put on any evidence as to one or more of the elements, the judge should dismiss the charge.
Example: Mary and a friend were arrested for grand theft for allegedly stealing a watch from a department store. At the preliminary hearing, the prosecution puts on evidence to show that Mary and her friend were in the store the day a watch was stolen. A visual recording depicts Mary’s friend putting a watch in her backpack. There is no visual recording of Mary. Mary was wearing pants with no pockets and was not carrying a purse, backpack, or anything else at the time. The prosecution presents no evidence whatsoever to show that Mary actually took anything. Mary’s lawyer will make a motion asking the judge to dismiss the case on the basis that the prosecution failed to put on evidence for one critical element, namely that Mary participated in the theft of the watch. If the judge denies the motion to dismiss, Mary’s lawyer can still try to negotiate a plea bargain with the prosecutor. The prosecutor may be willing to dismiss the charges altogether or reduce them significantly.