At some point in the early stages of criminal proceedings, whether at the first court appearance or a subsequent arraignment, courts ask defendants how they choose to plead. In the overwhelming majority of cases, it makes most sense for defendants to plead not guilty at this point. Defendants can almost always change their not-guilty pleas at some later point in the proceedings, but the same isn’t true of guilty (or no-contest) pleas. Defendants routinely enter initial pleas of not guilty, then plead guilty or no contest after their lawyers have reached deals with the prosecution. (See Plea Bargains.)
Here are some reasons why defendants initially plead “not guilty.”
- No lawyer. Most defendants don’t have anyone representing them to start. They haven’t received any qualified legal advice. For example, a defendant hasn’t heard from a lawyer about potential defenses or errors by the government, or the tendencies of different judges and prosecutors.
- No discovery. Oftentimes, defendants haven’t received any discovery by the time they’re asked to plead. The police report is usually the most important part of discovery in the early going. Without it, defendants may have little idea of the strength of the evidence against them. And even with the police report, but without further discovery (like photographs, recordings, and more) and investigation (including consultation with experts), the defendant still might not know the strength of the prosecution’s case. Police reports often contain limited information—they also can include misinformation, whether due to intentional deception or error by officers or witnesses.
- No promises. With some exceptions, defendants who plead guilty early on don’t know what the sentence will be. The point of plea bargaining—which typically occurs after initial appearances or arraignments—is to receive some kind of benefit in exchange for a guilty or no-contest plea. Without having a lawyer who has negotiated with the prosecution, a defendant who pleads guilty is subject to the whim of prosecutors and judges.
- Uncertain ramifications. Particularly without representation, people who’ve been accused of crime aren’t immediately aware of potential ramifications of conviction. Even if the court technically advises them that they will, for example, lose their drivers’ licenses or have to register as sex offenders, they may not fully understand. Plus, there are consequences to conviction that the court might not explain, such as loss of a job, endangerment of a professional license, or a harmful result in another legal proceeding (for example, a presumption against child custody for someone convicted of domestic violence). With a lawyer’s assistance, defendants who don’t have a reasonable chance at dismissal or acquittal may be able to plead to charges that don’t carry the same ramifications.