If you have a criminal arrest or conviction on your record, you might have a tough time landing a new job. Surveys show that a majority of employers – 92%, according to one survey – run a criminal background check when hiring for some or all positions. If you are one of the estimated 65 million Americans with a criminal record, it might put you out of the running for these jobs, especially in the current economic climate.
There are some legal protections for job seekers with criminal records. Federal law and the laws of many states place some limits on how employers can use these records in making job decisions. Although Utah’s Administrative Code formerly offered some protection for job seekers with criminal records, that provision is no longer in effect.
There are two federal laws that provide limited protection to applicants with criminal records.
The federal law that prohibits job discrimination, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, protects applicants and employees from discrimination in every aspect of employment, including screening practices and hiring. Title VII protects employees and applicants from policies or practices that disproportionately screen out members of a particular race, ethnicity, or other protected class. Because arrest and incarceration rates are so much higher for African Americans and Latinos, an employer that adopts a blanket policy of excluding all applicants with a criminal record might be guilty of race discrimination.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the federal agency that enforces Title VII, has issued guidance for employers, explaining how they can screen out applicants who might be dangerous or pose a safety risk without engaging in discrimination. In deciding whether a particular offense should be disqualifying, employers must consider:
The EEOC guidance states that employers should give applicants with a record an opportunity to explain the circumstances and provide mitigating information showing that the employee should not be excluded based on the offense.
The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) addresses the issue of accuracy in consumer reports, including background checks. Records generated by criminal background check firms may include errors, such as information on convictions that have been expunged, multiple listings of the same offense, misclassification of crimes, incomplete information (for example, failing to report that the person was exonerated of a crime or that charges were dropped), and even records that belong to another person with the same name.
The FCRA imposes responsibilities both on employers who request criminal background checks and on the firms that provide them. Employers must:
The firms that provide background checks must take reasonable steps to make sure that the information they provide is accurate and up to date. If you dispute what’s in the report, the agency must conduct a reasonable investigation. If the investigation reveals that the report was incorrect, the agency must inform you and any other person or company to whom it has provided the report.
States take different approaches in limiting employer use of criminal records in hiring and other employment decisions. Some states require employers to consider whether the offense bears a reasonable relationship to the job. Some states have passed laws restricting how employers may use an applicant’s criminal record in making job decisions. And, some states prohibit employers from asking about arrest records or criminal records that have been expunged.
In the past, Utah’s Administrative Code indicated that is was not permissible for employers to ask about arrest records. Although employers were legally allowed to ask about convictions, the Code stated that such inquiries were not advisable unless the convictions were related to the job. However, this Code provision has been repealed. In Utah, therefore, the federal laws discussed above provide the only legal protections for applicants who believe they were rejected based on criminal records.