Do I have to prove self-defense or does the prosecution have to disprove it?

A defendant who offers evidence of self-defense typically doesn’t have to convince the jury that he or she was justified in using force. In most instances, the burden remains on the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was not so justified. However, to raise the defense in the first place, the defendant has to produce some evidence that supports the self-defense theory. If there's no evidence whatsoever that the defendant believed the victim posed a threat, there isn't enough to shift the burden to the prosecution.

Example: A jury acquitted neighborhood-watch volunteer George Zimmerman of murdering 17-year-old Trayvon Martin not necessarily because the defense convinced the jury that he acted in self-defense, but because the prosecution didn’t prove that he didn’t. (See The George Zimmerman Verdict: Murder, Manslaughter, and Self-Defense.)

Talk to a Lawyer

Start here to find criminal defense lawyers near you.

How It Works

  1. Briefly tell us about your case
  2. Provide your contact information
  3. Connect with local attorneys
NOLO-web1:DRU1.6.8.23.20160804.41205