RELATED PRODUCTS MORE >>
-
Get Informed
Free Legal Information
Accidents & Injuries Bankruptcy Business Formation: LLCs & Corporations Criminal Law Debt Management Disability Law Divorce & Family Law DUI / DWI & Traffic Tickets Employment Law Foreclosure Immigration Landlords LGBT Law Nonprofits Patent, Copyright & Trademark Personal Finance Real Estate Small Business Small Claims Court & Lawsuits Social Security & Retirement Tenants Taxes Wills, Trusts & Probate -
Do It Yourself
Shop at Nolo
-
Find a Lawyer
Nolo's Lawyer Directory




Defendants who hire their own attorneys have the right to discharge them without court approval. A defendant does not need to show good cause or even justify the decision to the lawyer. (Most attorney-client agreements explicitly advise clients that they have the right to discharge their attorneys.)
After discharging a lawyer, defendants can hire another or, if qualified, represent themselves. Of course, the decision to change lawyers can be costly. In addition to paying the new lawyer, the defendant will have to pay the original lawyer whatever portion of the fee the original lawyer has earned.A defendant’s right to change lawyers must be weighed against the prosecutor’s right to keep the case moving on schedule. Assume, for example, that a defendant seeks to change attorneys on the eve of trial. The new attorney is likely to agree to represent the defendant only if the trial is delayed so that the new attorney can prepare. The prosecutor may oppose delay, perhaps because the prosecution witnesses will not be available to testify at a later date. In these circumstances, the judge may deny the defendant’s request to delay the trial. This would mean—realistically—that the defendant would have to stay with the original attorney rather than bring in an unprepared new attorney.