A toxic tort is a legal claim for harm caused by exposure to a dangerous substance—such as a pharmaceutical drug, pesticide, or chemical. Most toxic tort injuries arise in one of the following ways:
Learn more about the basics in our toxic torts overview.
Plaintiffs in toxic tort lawsuits can use a number of legal theories to try to establish liability and receive compensation for their injuries. Some common claims in toxic tort cases include:
Figuring out who's responsible for a toxic tort victim's exposure to a dangerous substance can be difficult. Plaintiffs generally sue anybody that had a link to the toxin, including:
An injured plaintiff must bring a lawsuit within a certain period of time after harm occurred—under laws called statutes of limitations. In toxic tort cases, many plaintiffs don't discover their injuries until many years after the harm occurred, because symptoms often take years to show up.
Luckily, most states follow the "discovery rule," which means the clock doesn't start ticking on the statute of limitations deadline until the plaintiff actually discovers the harm (or when the circumstances are such that the plaintiff reasonably should have discovered it). If you just recently became ill from your exposure to a dangerous chemical, meaning you just discovered that the chemical harmed you, it's probably not too late to sue. Contact a lawyer immediately.
Learn more about the statute of limitations.
Probably. Mesothelioma, an often-fatal lung disease, is caused by prolonged exposure to asbestos. Lawsuits have established that the asbestos industry hid the health dangers of asbestos for decades, and workers were needlessly exposed to asbestos (a cancer-causing substance) as a result.
For this reason, if you suffer from mesothelioma because you worked with asbestos, you have a very good chance of recovering money damages for your illness—either from the company that manufactured or installed the asbestos or through an insurer or victims' compensation fund that has assumed liability on the company's behalf.
Learn more about mesothelioma and asbestos claims.
Possibly so. Plaintiffs in silica lawsuits can use a number of legal theories to prove that an employer, manufacturer, or some other company is liable for silicosis and other injuries caused by silica exposure. Two of the more common are negligence and product liability.
For example, workers might allege that a manufacturer of a product containing silica (such as blasting sand) didn't act reasonably when it failed to warn employers and employees that the product contained silica and that silica is dangerous when inhaled. This theory might be especially effective in lawsuits by workers who became sick after being exposed to silica in previous decades, when the dangers of silica weren't well known or typically made public.
Plaintiffs can also use product liability claims against manufacturers of safety equipment. For example, if a ventilator is defective and fails to protect workers from inhalation of silica dust, workers could sue the manufacturer of the ventilator.
It's definitely a good idea to be represented by experienced legal counsel if you want to pursue a toxic tort claim. Typically, these claims involve special procedures and rules that don't apply in, say, a car accident case. Lawyers often specialize in different kinds of toxic tort claims, and they know how to guide you through the process efficiently while maximizing the compensation you recover.
If you think you have a toxic tort claim, here's how to find a lawyer who's right for you.