By Rich Stim
Trade secrets often comprise customer lists, sensitive
marketing information, unpatended inventions, software, formulas and recipes,
techniques, processes, and other business information that provides a company
with a business edge.
Information is more likely to be considered a trade secret
if it is:
- not known outside of the particular business
entity
- known only by employees and others involved in
the business
- subject to reasonable measures to guard the
secrecy of the information
- valuable, and
- difficult for others to properly acquire or
independently duplicate
Trade secrets are typically protected by nondisclosure agreements (NDAs).
California is one of the many states that have adopted
the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. California’s trade secret law can be found at Cal.
Civil Code §§ 3426-3426.11.
Misappropriation in California
California’s version of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act refers
to the theft of trade secrets as misappropriation. Under California law,
"misappropriation " refers to the acquisition of a trade secret by
someone who knows or has reason to know that the trade secret was acquired by
improper means -- theft, bribery, misrepresentation, breach or inducement of a
breach of duty to maintain secrecy. It also includes the disclosure or use of a
trade secret without consent by someone who used improper means to acquire knowledge
of the trade secret – for example, an ex-employee who spills company secrets to
a rival.
Reason to Know
California prohibits use of trade secrets by a company that
has “has reason to know” that the material constitutes a trade secret. This is
known as constructive knowledge (versus actual knowledge). In other words, even
if a California company was unaware it possessed purloined trade secrets, it
can still be prosecuted under California law if it should have known.
Penalties for Misappropriation
Under California law, a trade secret thief can be prevented
from disclosure by court order – an injunction. This is true for both actual or
threatened misappropriation. The injunction may be terminated when the trade
secret has ceased to exist, but the injunction may be continued for an
additional reasonable period of time in order to eliminate any commercial
advantage that otherwise would be derived from the misappropriation. In exceptional
circumstances, an injunction may condition future use upon payment of a
reasonable royalty for no longer than the period of time for which use could
have been prohibited. Exceptional circumstances can a theft that is so bad that
the court order would be meaningless.
A victim of trade secret theft can also seek financial
compensation that measures the actual loss attributed to the theft or the
profits (or “unjust enrichment”) acquired by the trade secret thief. In
egregious situations, a California court can award punitive damages up to twice
the amount of any award. Attorney fees will also be awarded in egregious
(willful and malicious) situations or if a claim is brought in bad faith.
Statute Of Limitations
An action for misappropriation must be brought within 3
years after the misappropriation is discovered or by the exercise of reasonable
diligence should have been discovered.
California Law Establishes Trade Secret Ownership
California is unique in that its laws expressly establish
that the employer owns trade secrets created by an employee. (Cal. Labor Code
Sec. 2860). However, an employer in California would not own trade secrets
created on an employee's own time without the use of employee materials. Although the law does not require a contract,
it's a good idea to buttress your position in California by the use of a
written agreement.
Federal Law
In addition to California’s rules regarding trade secrets,
certain federal rules also apply in California. The Economic Espionage Act of
1996 makes the theft of trade secrets a federal crime. The Act prohibits the
theft of a trade secret by a person intending or knowing that the offense will
injure a trade secret owner. The Act also makes it a federal crime to receive,
buy, or possess trade secret information knowing it to have been stolen. The
Act’s definition of “trade secret” is similar to that of the Uniform Trade
Secrets Act. The penalties for a violation of this statute include a potential
prison term of 15 years and fines up to $5 million, depending on whether the
defendant is an individual or a corporation. A private party can still sue for
trade secret theft even if the federal government files a criminal case under
the Economic Espionage Act.
Learn more about Patent, Copyright, and Trademark.