Law Offices of Gregory B. Orton
414 First St. East
Suite 1
Sonoma, CA 95476
Phone: (707) 935-0356 | Fax: (707) 935-0366
http://www.ortonlaw.com
Bankruptcy
Bankruptcy, real property litigation, real property purchase agreements, real property management, easements, evictions, etc.
Business Law
Bankruptcy, real property litigation, real property purchase agreements, real property management, easements, evictions, etc.
CA, Dec 1996
Bar Number: 184142
All California state courts; Federal courts in Northern and Eastern Districts of California.
California State Bar.
I go to various seminars and lectures and study courses of interest through approved providers.
I represented Plaintiff in an easement dispute that involved her neighbor, father, and two realtors. The legal issue was simple and straightforward. The emotional issue was complicated and enduring. The case settled after four years of litigation. My client prevailed and paid me a total of $11,000 in attorney's fees. The neighbor incurred over $45,000 in attorney's fees and the malpractice carrier shelled out just short of $100,000 to defend one real estate agent. I don't know what the other carrier incurred. The lesson here is obvious and one that I point out to most clients in litigation. There are good ways, and efficient, economical ways to resolve conflict, and then there is litigation.
Master of Arts
JFK University
Orinda
CA
1981
Clinical Psychology.
Bachelor of Arts
California State University
Fullerton
CA
1979
Clinical Abnormal Psychology.
Ph.D.
Professional School of Psychology
San Francisco
CA
1988
Clinical Psychology.
Juris Doctorate
Empire College School of Law
Santa Rosa
CA
1996
I had the top grade for real property and was consistently in the top 10% in all classes. I also graduated a four year night school program in three years. I graduated in June, 1996 and took the Bar exam in July, 1996. I learned that I passed the Bar in November, 1996, and was sworn in December of 1996. I had a wife and three children under the age of ten during my years in law school and worked full time throughout.
Raising and supporting a family of four while in law school at the age of 39 to 42.
1
California
Bankruptcy representing debtors in Chapter 7 and 11, occasionally Chapter 13; real property litigation and litigation involving small business disputes; real property purchases, easements, boundary disputes, evictions, commercial leases, lease-options, etc.
Firm established in 1996. I took over firm from a lawyer retiring and slowly learned the litigation business, trial expertise, etc.
I was a licensed psychotherapist before going to law school. I had a thriving psychology practice working with families and teens to overcome addiction problems, school problems, etc. I have a Ph.D. in clinical psychology that I no longer market or practice under. My psychology license is on voluntary inactive status because I no longer practice and don't envision returning to practice at any time.
A little knowledge is instructive; a little more is presumptive and more than that is problematic for both client and attorney. The internet is especially troubling in that a client can inform herself just enough to question bad advice, but not enough to counsel herself. The end result is conflict between client and attorney that impedes resolution between client and adversary.
It depends on why the documents were prepared and for whom. I frequently ask clients to prepare documents that give a history of the conflict, especially the facts. I do not want a client to lay out their proposed resolution of the case because it presents an inherent challenge to the structure of the attorney/client relationship. In the end, it will cost the client more to resolve the dispute. It is a difficult proposition when someone retains an attorney to resolve a dispute that a client cannot on her own resolve, but "suggests" how the dispute might be resolved by "competent" counsel.
I am aware of the "limited scope" representation and support it in very limited circumstances, e.g. evictions, dissolutions where neither custody nor division of marital assets is an issue. I believe that the practice of law is a highly specialized profession and rarely is it justified for a client to control expenses by doing some of the work herself. It is likely to result in extra work for the attorney, in the long run.
I don't know. I decided to retire from delivering psych services under a managed care system when it became impossible to control my own practice. Friends and colleagues advised me to consider going to law school because of my propensity to argue just for the sake of arguing. It was a very difficult decision. I had three small children and a wife at the time, and I had been a student for many, many years already. However, I committed myself to study the law and enjoyed every minute of it, even the late hours when I wouldn't get home until after 11:00 p.m. I'd do it all over again in a heartbeat. My best year is this year, and my best year prior to that was last year. The only downer is when you make good $ you pay $$$$$$ in taxes.
All of it, especially that which makes you reflect on your own life experience.
It chose me.
I like that my wife was able to quit her job and learn how to manage my practice. I love working for my wife.
My wife is the "people" working for me. I am considering hiring another lawyer because I think I would enjoy the camaraderie.
I constantly get feedback from clients and referrals that I am the antithesis of an arrogant, stuffy, self-involved attorney who has nothing more in mind than what he will bill this client.
I am an avid motorcyclist who can build his own, and a guitarist who can hold his own. I am a poet who probably could have made a living using words to describe events, whether imagined, experienced, contemplated, or dreamed, but what I am most proud of has nothing to do with any of that. I have a wonderful wife and three children who wrap decency 'round their souls.
(707) 935-0366
Monday through Friday
9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
Saturday
10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
No
I offer a flat fee for Chapter 7 bankruptcies, and residential evictions. Essentially, an attorney who offers a flat fee takes the risk that a case will be more complicated than is usual and will thus lose at the end, but gambles on the case being little more than filling in forms and making appearances. The convenience is really in being able to tell prospective clients who call what it will cost to do what it is they want you to do.
New clients pay $265.
Yes. I don't recall cutting a client off because she has taken more time than I intended to give for a "free" consultation.
My typical retainer for a Plaintiff is $3,500. This is intended to cover investigation, research, drafting, filing and serving a civil complaint, including filing fees and costs.
Fees and costs for defending a civil suit differ. I frequently sell several hours under a "true retainer" format and the retainer is simply the number of hours anticipated to get it done multiplied by the fee per hour.
Attorneys have passed a licensing check. Nolo has confirmed that every member attorney has a valid license and is in good standing with the applicable bar associations upon joining the directory.
Directory lawyers are required to notify Nolo immediately if they become the subject of any disciplinary action by any bar association.