Small text sizeMedium text sizeLarge text size Print this page
Back to Search Results
Michael D. Goforth

Michael D. Goforth

Goforth & Lucas Law Partnership
2300 Clayton Road
Suite 1460
Concord, CA 94520

Phone: (925) 682-9500  |  Fax: (925) 682-2353
http://www.goforthlucas.com/

Contact Michael D. Goforth

Northern California's Leading Personal Injury Firm

Legal Topic

Personal Injury

Preferred New Clients

Serious industrial injury claims. We take pride in maximizing economic recoveries for clients who have suffered catastrophic physical and psychological injuries including amputation, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injuries and death. Our clients' claims often include civil court law suits against third parties, such as a responsible sub-contractor or an uninsured employer.

Sub-Categories

Personal Injury
  • Wrongful Death
  • Motorcycle Accidents
  • Truck Accidents
Accidents & Personal Injury
  • Construction Site Injuries
  • Slip & Fall
  • Sports Injuries
  • Petrochemical Accidents
Car/Auto Accidents
  • Whiplash
  • Felony Auto Accident
Dangerous Products/Product Liability
  • Design Defects
  • Manufacturing Defects
Intentional Injuries
  • Assault & Battery
  • Child abuse
  • Dog Bites & Animal Attacks
  • Police Misconduct
  • Sexual Assault
Mass Accidents
  • Airplanes
  • Buildings
  • Mass Transit - Bus, Train, Subway
  • Ships & Boats
Professional Malpractice
  • Financial Malpractice
  • Legal Malpractice
  • Religious Malpractice
Medical Malpractice
  • Elder and Nursing Home Abuse
  • Psychiatric Malpractice
  • Spinal Cord Injury
Toxic Torts & Class Actions
  • Chemicals & Cosmetics
  • Dangerous Drugs & Products
  • Medical Products & Devices
Serious/Catastrophic Injuries
  • Amputation
  • Burn Injury
  • Head/Brain Injury
  • Paralysis

Bar Admissions

CA, May 1979
Bar Number: 85610

Other Court Admissions

All California and Federal Courts.

Association Memberships

Contra Costa County Bar Association and the California State Bar Association.

Continuing Education

I continue to participate in and exceed the State Bar required continuing education hours.

Papers and Publications

Please refer to www.goforthlucas.com.

Example Cases

Recent Settlement

Court/Branch: Contra Costa Superior Unlimited Jurisdiction, Martinez, CA
Case Name: Gary Taylor v. Confidential refinery owner and Confidential Scaffold Contractor
Judge: Hon. Barbara Zuñiga, Dept 2
Mediator: Hon. Raul A. Ramirez (Ret), Sacramento, CA
Date of Settlement: 2009
Type of case: Industrial/negligence
Settlement amount: $1,500,000 ($65,000 from Refinery Owner, $1,435,000 from Scaffold Co). This case settled following one full day of mediation. The settlement was a third party Compromise and Release wherein intervenor agreed to waive its $322,614.17 industrial lien.

Plaintiff counsel: Michael D. Goforth, Goforth & Lucas Law Partnership, 2300 Clayton Rd., Suite 1460, Concord, CA; Phone: 925-682-9500; Fax: 925-682-2353; email mdg@goforthlucas.com. Mr. Goforth also represented the plaintiff in the workers' compensation claim filed October 26, 2006.

Facts

On August 3, 2006, plaintiff, then 51, was working as a pipefitter for Timec Company, Inc. inside of a Martinez, CA flexicoker reactor, during a refinery "turnaround" (shutdown).

The reactor is a multi-story cylinder with a circular metal dipleg (pipe) running vertically through its center.

The scaffold within the reactor consisted of steel planks connected in a rectangular configuration around the dipleg which left a gap between the metal planks and the dipleg. Brand covered the gap with wooden planks and plywood to prevent workers from falling through the scaffold deck in the areas near the dipleg.

At the beginning of his shift plaintiff entered the reactor and began looking for a power source to connect his electric grinding tools. When plaintiff stepped near the dipleg, a wooden board gave way and plaintiff's right leg plunged through the deck to waist level.

Plaintiff's left leg hyperflexed under his weight. Plaintiff was able to halt his downward plummet by his elbows, shoulders, and large body size which kept him from passing entirely through to the floor below. Plaintiff fell forward with a twisting motion onto both hands and arms. He was able to get himself out of the hole and down a 7 foot ladder. First aid was rendered on site and plaintiff tried to continue working over the next several days, but noted progressive pain in his left knee. Within a few days of the accident plaintiff also complained of soreness all over as well as localized pain to his right shoulder.

Ultimately, plaintiff's injuries were diagnosed as: left knee derangement, right and left shoulder ruptured tendons, and L2-3 and L4-L5 disc herniations. In November 2006 plaintiff underwent arthroscopic partial medial and lateral meniscectomy of the left knee. In December 2007 plaintiff underwent open rotator cuff repair of the right shoulder.

In February 2007 plaintiff returned to work for 43 days but stopped due to progressive pain in his shoulders, back and left knee. In January 2008 Plaintiff underwent left total knee replacement and did not return to work thereafter due to worsening back pain.

Plaintiff had worked for Timec for 6 months and as a pipefitter intermittently prior to that time for several years. Plaintiff's contended that his injuries prevented him from returning to work as a pipefitter.

Plaintiff's contentions:

1.) Scaffold Co. failed to safely build and maintain the scaffold that the plaintiff was using
2.) Refinery, as owner operator of the reactor, failed to protect the integrity of the work site or insure project safety
3.) Employer, failed to inspect the worksite or properly train its workers
4.) Plaintiff could never return to work as a pipefitter as a result of his injuries

Defendants' contentions:

1.) Plaintiff was inattentive to an open and obvious hole in the scaffold
2.) Scaffold Co. was not liable since it appeared that one of the contractors working on the project modified the scaffold
3.) Plaintiff's back injuries were non-industrial since the medical file doesn't mention plaintiff's back complaints until some 5 weeks post-accident
4.) Refinery had no liability because Scaffold Co. was responsible for the scaffold construction

Intervener's contentions:

1.) There is no evidence that the employer did anything or failed to do something that caused the subject accident
2.) Intervener is entitled to full reimbursement of benefits paid (medical $231,259.14, indemnity $91,355.03) pursuant to LC § 3850, et seq.
3.) Any comparative fault assessed against the plaintiff may not be imputed to the employer

Recent amputation case:

Our 18 year old client suffered traumatic amputation of her left arm at the shoulder as the result of a head on collision which killed three other people. Our client was seat belted and sitting in the rear passenger seat.

The sudden deceleration forces of the collision caused luggage in the trunk to generate several tons of forward pressure, breaking through the rear bulkhead of the car. The enormous pressure caused our client's seat belt to act as a ligature, forcing the amputation.

Our mediated settlement against the at fault driver and the auto manufacturer is confidential. The condition of confidentiality was demanded by the auto manufacturer. The settlement enabled our client to return to a relatively comfortable life.

Recent work site injury settlement:

Workers' compensation--third party construction injury where an ironworker fell through a HVAC floor duct hatch that had not been properly secured. I represented the injured employee in the workers' compensation claim at the Oakland Workers' Compensation Appeals Board against the employer and in a civil law suit in San Francisco Superior Court against the general contractor and a sub-contractor, both of whom violated safety standards. The civil claim settled for $650,000.00 after a two day mediation hearing. Through my office's investigation, employer negligence was found to be a contributing cause in the accident which precluded the workers' compensation carrier from recovering reimbursement of my client's settlement money.

Education

Degree:

Bachelor of Arts

School:

University of California

City:

Berkeley

State:

CA

Year:

1973

Focus and Accomplishments:

Political Science.

 

Degree:

Juris Doctor

School:

Western State University College of Law

City:

San Diego

State:

CA

Year:

1978

Number of Attorneys

2

State Licensed In

California

Firm Focus and History

Goforth & Lucas Law Partnership handles catastrophic personal injury, and workers' compensation claims.

Goforth & Lucas was established in the early '80's as a plaintiffs' personal injury firm. In the decades since the firm has expanded its focus to include workers' compensation and third party claims against negligent sub-contractors or uninsured employers.

Previous Employment Summary

For 30 years I have represented severely injured clients.

Activities and Awards

I have served as an arbitrator and mediator in many cases involving bodily injuries and tort claims. I have served as a fee arbitrator for the Contra Costa County Bar Association.

What is your opinion regarding clients educating themselves on legal issues?

More is better.

Are you willing to review documents prepared by clients?

Yes. I am always available to review any documents that will help my clients.

Are you willing to coach clients who want to represent themselves?

Where the client acts as his/her own advocate I am willing to educate and assist them their claim and the legal issues.

Why did you decide to be a lawyer?

My father is a lawyer and my granddad was a judge. I've always liked finding solutions to legal issues.

What work experience and education helps you be a better lawyer?

Total dedication to protecting my clients' rights and recovering full compensation for their injuries.

Why did you decide on your primary area of practice?

The injured person is always at a disadvantage and needs someone to help level the playing field. Through use of the contingency fee system, the best results are attainable by every one of our clients regardless of their economic circumstances.

What do you like best about your career?

Getting excellent compensation for my clients, thus allowing them to continue with their lives.

Tell us about your law firm:

My firm consists of two lawyers with a support staff of four. The staff is hyper-sensitive to the painful and economically draining circumstances that befall clients who have suffered sudden and catastrophic injuries.

I am always available through my office or via e-mail: mdg@goforthlucas.com. I make hospital or home calls upon request. We begin each case with a face-to-face interview for as long as it takes to get the file set up and a case "game plan" established.

The attorneys and staff speak fluent Spanish.

What are your strengths and style?

Conviction that the injured client has a righteous claim. The clients' rights must be dogmatically and aggressively prosecuted.

Personal Interests:

Mountaineering, whitewater rafting, painting, my intelligent Doberman, Von, and good wine.

Office Manager/Assistant

Law clerk: Carmen Fazli, Scheduling clerk: Itzel Rivera

Fax

(925) 682-2353

Office Hours

Monday through Friday
8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

Emergency After Hours

Yes

Foreign Languages

Yes. Both attorneys and the staff speak Spanish.

Fixed-Price Services and Fees

We work on a contingency fee basis. The client never has to pay out of pocket.

Hourly Rates

Not applicable.

Free Initial Consultation?

Free consultation for as long as it takes.

Typical Retainer

Not applicable.

Understanding Fees

Nolo's Licensing Check

Attorneys have passed a licensing check. Nolo has confirmed that every member attorney has a valid license and is in good standing with the applicable bar associations upon joining the directory.

Directory lawyers are required to notify Nolo immediately if they become the subject of any disciplinary action by any bar association.