Thomas Roland, Attorney at Law
1830 Berkeley Way
Berkeley, CA 94703
Phone: (510) 841-1500 | Fax: (510) 217-3589
http://www.tomroland.com
Criminal Defense
I find all cases that I take are interesting and worthy of my attention. I try very hard to keep my clients out of prison and free from lifetime registration requirements.
CA, Jan 1972
Bar Number: 51447
- California Supreme Court
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Northern District of California
- Eastern District of California
- Alameda County Bar Association
- California State Bar
- Contra Costa County Bar Association
My continuing education is approved by the California State Bar.
People v. Escarcega (1974) 43 Cal.App.3d 391;
People v. Rossi (1976)
18 Cal.3d 295;
In re D.C.L. (1978) 82 Cal.App.3d 123 -- In D.C.L. I represented a teenager who went onto private property and entered a private shed/workshop with apparent intent to steal. He was found guilty of trespassing. I appealed the case and the conviction was reversed because I convinced the court of appeal that the shed/workshop was not one of the "buildings" referred to in the criminal statute.
People v. Berkeley (1978) 88 Cal.App.3d 457 -- In People v. Berkeley, I represented a homeowner who was arrested after the police got a search warrant and then entered his house and found a very large quantity of drugs. I convinced the trial judge to throw the case out on the ground that the police did not "knock and announce" their presence before breaking into the house. My client tried to go to the front door to answer the police officers' knock, but another police officer was holding him at gunpoint in the rear of the house and would not let him answer the door. The district attorney appealed to the court of appeal, which affirmed the judgment dismissing the case.
In re Wayne H. (1979) 24 Cal.3d 595; People v. Morris (1979) 97 Cal.App.3d 358
Alma W. v. Oakland Unified School District (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 133 -- In Alma W., my client was a minor who was allegedly raped by a school custodian. The court of appeal decided that the school district was not liable for her injuries.
In re Estate of Joseph (1998) 17 Cal.4th 203.
I was attorney of record for appellant or for amicus curiae on appeal in each case except Morris, in which I was trial counsel.
B.S.
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor
MI
1960
Gomberg Fellowship in Chemistry.
Chemistry, Math, involved in Civil Rights (Freedom Rider, Mississippi).
J.D.
University of San Francisco Law School
San Francisco
CA
1971
Graduated near the tom of the class.
Law Review.
1
California
I've been in practice, mostly as a sole practitioner, since 1972. I practice mostly in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties.
I taught high school math in the Oakland public schools from 1963 to 1971. Before that, I drove a taxicab in Oakland for a couple of years.
I still work very hard in my law practice. My wife and I are also raising two toddler grandchildren. I spend most of my time otherwise restoring our Queen Anne Victorian home, doing most of the work myself.
In civil law, such as family law, pro per litigants usually do fairly well if they have the right personalities and intelligence. In criminal law, pro per litigants do okay in DUI cases; otherwise, I think it's dangerous to go without a lawyer in a criminal case.
Reviewing client-prepared documents is difficult, but sometimes will work.
Coaching clients to represent themselves is difficult and should not be done. The party should, in my opinion, go it alone or with a lawyer. "Coaching" is not, in my opinion, very efficient or effective.
I was bored being a high school math teacher.
Any rigorous academic field of study will provide the necessary underlying analytical skills, from science to social science to history or literature.
I got interesting cases in family law, probate, and criminal defense, even though I took no probate or family law courses in law school.
I like the variety, the challenge, and providing valuable services to clients.
I am a sole practitioner, working out of a home office for the past ten years.
I am a good negotiator. I am excellent in cross-examination and in depositions.
I am friendly and easy-going when that works for my client. I am aggressive when that works. My style in each case depends to a large extent on my analysis of the case and the best interest of my client.
I like restoring and maintaining my Victorian residence. I am interested in politics, history, and religion.
Kamilah Lewis
(510) 217-3589
Monday through Friday
9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Yes
I will sometimes offer a flat fee after reviewing the case.
$300 per hour.
I offer free initial consultation.
My typical retainer is around $2,500.
Attorneys have passed a licensing check. Nolo has confirmed that every member attorney has a valid license and is in good standing with the applicable bar associations upon joining the directory.
Directory lawyers are required to notify Nolo immediately if they become the subject of any disciplinary action by any bar association.