Brandt Criminal Defense, P.L.L.C.
403 Jackson Street
Suite 303
Anoka, MN 55303
Phone: (763) 421-6366 | Fax: (763) 433-8570
http://www.brandtdefense.com
Criminal Defense
Our firm represents clients charged with every kind of criminal offense. We have represented clients in murder cases down to speeding tickets and every type of case in between. We have vast experience in DWI and DWI-related matters.
MN, Oct 1994
Bar Number: 0248514
Minnesota Supreme Court; Federal District Court.
Minnesota State Bar Association; Anoka County Bar Association.
For the past 7-8 years I have received the majority of my Continuing Legal Education credits by teaching continuing education. Included in my teaching experience are the following: *Minnesota DWI Deskbook -- co-author and lecturer *Minnesota Judicial College -- presenter on evidence issues *Criminal Justice Institute -- presenter on evidence in DWI cases *Minnesota Public Defender's -- lecturer to Third Judicial District Public Defender's Annual Meeting *Minnesota Public Defender's -- lecturer at the Minnesota Public Defender's Annual Conference *Minnesota Public Defender's -- lecturer to First Judicial District Public Defender's Quarterly Meeting *Minnesota DWI Institute -- lecturer *Thomson West -- presenter on Criminal Law 101 *All-District Legal -- Creative Sentencing & Plea Negotiations *Winning the One-on-One Sex case *Minnesota Institute on Legal Education -- lecture on evidence.
Minnesota DWI Deskbook, Volumes 1 and 2, co-author.
Felony Assault in the Third Degree: Client was charged with Felony Assault in the Third Degree (inflicting substantial bodily harm). The prosecutor offered a Simple Assault in the Fifth Degree prior to trial (a misdemeanor) and the client rejected the offer. After a 2-day trial, the client was acquitted of all charges.
DWI/Test Refusal: Client was accused of a third DWI in 10 years, which would have caused the client to lose his license for a year and been subject to up to a year in jail with a mandatory minimum of 90 days. We challenged whether or not the client's right to speak with an attorney prior to deciding whether to test or not was vindicated. The court found that the client's right was not vindicated and the client's driving privileges were fully reinstated. Based upon our result in the license hearing, the prosecutor reduced the criminal charge to one of Careless Driving.
Felony Controlled Substance Crime in the Second Degree: Client was charged with possession of methamphetamine. Because the client had a previous drug conviction, he was looking at over 5 years in prison if convicted. The State offered him a deal where he would not go to prison, but would be placed on probation. We challenged the legality of the police to seize my client and therefore search him. The Judge ruled that the client was illegally seized and suppressed the drugs. The case was dismissed.
These cases are a small sampling of the hundreds of cases that we have successfully resolved for clients through jury trials, suppression hearings, license revocation hearings, and negotiations.
Juris Doctor cum laude
William Mitchell College of Law
St. Paul
MN
1994
Graduated cum laude
While at William Mitchell College of Law, I was a member of the Rosalie E. Wahl Moot Court Society and a member of the William Mitchell College of Law Trial Advocacy Team that traveled to Chicago for a regional trial advocacy competition.
B.A.
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis
MN
1991
Major: Political Science; Minor: Spanish
2
Minnesota
Brandt Criminal Defense was founded in 2005. Prior to that time, the firm was organized as Jasper & Brandt until my former partner was appointed to the Tenth Judicial District Bench.
For the past 13 plus years, I have represented clients charged with every type of offense from homicide to speeding tickets. Our firm represents clients charged with every sort of offense, with a particular focus on DWI and DWI-related offenses. We are aggressive trial lawyers who have tried dozens of cases, have conducted hundreds of suppression hearings, and have litigated hundreds of other issues throughout the courts.
Upon graduation with honors from William Mitchell College of Law, I began working as an Assistant Public Defender for the Tenth Judicial District Public Defender's Office. During my 5 years in that position, I represented hundreds of clients on felony cases, misdemeanor cases, and probation violations. I personally conducted dozens of jury trials, including First Degree Murder, Assault, Sexual Conduct, and various other offenses. While at the Public Defender's Office, I held the record for the fastest acquittal on a case (approximately 12 minutes). I left the Public Defender's Office in 1999 and went to work as an Associate Attorney for Allan Caplan & Associates, a law firm specializing in criminal defense. While there, I continued representing clients on every type of charges, but started to focus on representing clients charged with DWI. While at Caplan I conducted numerous jury trials throughout the State. In 2003 I left Allan Caplan & Associates to form Jasper & Brandt, PLLC with Jonathan Jasper, as he and I had very similar philosophies in representing clients. We took a very aggressive approach to representing clients but were also very pragmatic; we knew when to negotiate and when to litigate. In 2005, Jonathan Jasper was appointed to the Tenth Judicial District Bench by Governor Pawlenty, at which time I re-formed the firm as Brandt Criminal Defense. Since that time, Brandt Criminal Defense has continued to provide top-notch representation for clients finding themselves on the wrong side of the law.
I am a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, a group of the top 50 DWI lawyers in the State of Minnesota. We work together to develop new ways of tackling DWI cases, sharing resources, and conducting Continuing Legal Education seminars. I am also a member of the Minnesota Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, where I serve as a Member of the Board of Directors, a member of the American Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, a member of the Minnesota State Bar Association, and am active in the Anoka County Bar Association.
Whenever I meet with a new client who has done research as to his/her particular legal issue and has obtained information, I find this helpful and I encourage clients to educate themselves.
I feel it is my job to educate my clients and many times I help clients to understand the intricacies of their case. Because there are many nuances in criminal law and while a basic understanding of the law and procedures are important, I also believe it is important that an experienced criminal attorney evaluate a client's case to look for legal issues and theories that may not be apparent to the untrained eye.
Because of the special area of law in which I practice (criminal defense), it is not pragmatic or feasible for clients to prepare documents themselves and present legal arguments to the court. While I have reviewed other documents in other legal areas drafted by clients, it is certainly advisable to leave such matters to the attorney.
As part of my practice, I often meet with clients who may not have the means to hire a private attorney. I will many times provide them with tips and pointers on how they might best handle their case. I certainly warn clients that there may be some peril in handling the case themselves, but I am certainly willing to assist clients who are not in a position to hire me.
Prior to attending college, I worked for nearly 10 years in the construction business. When I decided to go back to school to earn my undergraduate degree and law degree, I knew that I wanted to work in an area where I was going to be challenged, could work with people, and use my personal and analytical skills to help people.
I grew up in Northeast Minneapolis in a blue collar neighborhood and have seen and experienced poverty and troubled youth. I myself have run through my own troubles as a young adult. Working in construction for nearly 10 years showed me another side of humans that one may not see going directly from high school to college to law school. My broad experience allows me to understand the plights of people from different walks of life, from different socio-economic areas, and different backgrounds. Each client is unique and my varied background gives me the ability to relate to them. This applies not just in dealing with clients, but also in dealing with prosecutors, judges, probation officers and others in the criminal justice system.
I have always been attracted to criminal law, both from my experiences in growing up and my experiences in law school and afterward. Criminal law is dynamic and fast-moving.
One of the most gratifying things about my profession is that I am given the opportunity to help people. There is nothing more gratifying to me than to hear comments from clients how I have helped them get through a very difficult time, how I helped them to change their lives, or how I assisted them in navigating the waters of the criminal justice system.
We are a small law firm with two attorneys and one full-time assistant. We have a very cohesive team that works together to represent clients. My assistant, Kelly Kirchner, is a vital part of our firm. She is the force that keeps the cases scheduled, is a calm voice on the phone, and makes sure all the filings and paperwork are in order.
Each lawyer has a different style in representing clients and dealing with court personnel. We adopt a philosophy that you catch more bees with honey than with vinegar. However, we are also very aggressive if we have to litigate a matter. There are certain issues over which it is important to fight and other issues where cooperation is the appropriate route. We know which issue to fight and when to cooperate.
In addition to my thriving law practice, I enjoy spending time with my family, biking, racquetball, hockey, and travel.
Kelly Kirchner
(763) 433-8570
Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Yes
Spanish
Fees are established on a case-by-case basis. Each case is unique and each case presents varying levels of complexity and work. My philosophy in setting fees is to meet with a client, evaluate the case, decipher the client's goals and objectives, and then after fully understanding the situation I am able to determine a fee.
All of our cases are handled on a fixed-fee basis.
I am willing to meet with clients for free to evaluate their case, discuss their circumstances, and give them my honest opinion as to their situation. These meetings are as short as 15 minutes, but sometimes will exceed one hour. I do not charge for these initial meetings.
It is very difficult to say what the typical retainer would be. We handle a vast majority of cases from homicides down to speeding tickets. Each case is unique and the work and complexity of each case varies. Therefore, it is impossible for me to say what a typical retainer on a case may be.
Attorneys have passed a licensing check. Nolo has confirmed that every member attorney has a valid license and is in good standing with the applicable bar associations upon joining the directory.
Directory lawyers are required to notify Nolo immediately if they become the subject of any disciplinary action by any bar association.