Small text sizeMedium text sizeLarge text size Print this page
Back to Search Results
Lawrence D. Rohlfing

Lawrence D. Rohlfing

Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing
12631 E Imperial Highway
Suite C115
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670

Phone: (562) 868-5886  |  Fax: (562) 868-5491
http://www.californiasocialsecurityattorney.com

Contact Lawrence D. Rohlfing

CA Attorneys Practicing Social Security Disability.

Legal Topic

Government & Environment

Preferred New Clients

Information coming soon.

Sub-Categories

Bar Admissions

CA, Dec 1985
Bar Number: 119433

Other Court Admissions

Supreme Court of the United States of America
Supreme Court of California
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
Central District of California
Eastern District of California
Southern District of California
District of Arizona (admitted as an out-of-state lawyer)

Association Memberships

California State Bar Association
Los Angeles County Bar Association - Social Security Section
American Bar Association

Continuing Education

I speak and attend CLE conventions regularly. I earn approximately 40 hours per year.

Papers and Publications

Presentations
-Southeast Bar Association of Los Angeles County, "My Journey to the Supreme Court" September 2003
-United States Magistrate Judges, Central District of California, "Current Issues in Social Security Cases in Federal Court" September 2003 - Revision of Model Orders for Further -Proceedings with Jan Walli, Chief Counsel Region IX OGC SSA, and Leon Weidman, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Chief Civil Division, Central District of California
-National Business Institute, "Handling Social Security Cases in California" July 2003
-National Organization of Social Security Claimants' Representatives, "Attorney Fees in Social Security Cases, Administrative" April 2003
-National Organization of Social Security Claimants' Representatives, "Cross-Examining Vocational Experts" November 2002
-National Organization of Social Security Claimants' Representatives, "ERISA Litigation for Social Security Lawyers" May 2002
-National Business Institute, "Handling Social Security Cases in California" September 2001
-National Organization of Social Security Claimants' Representatives, "Attorney Fees in Social Security Cases" April 2001
-Los Angeles County Bar Association, Social Security Section, "Mandamus as Relief for Non-Payment of Benefits and Fees" February 2001
-National Organization of Social Security Claimants' Representatives, "The United States District Court - The Next Step in the Adjudication of Social Security Disability Claims - For Beginners" October 2000
-Los Angeles County Bar Association, Social Security Section, "To Appeal or to File Anew, That is the Question. Answer: Do Both" May 2000
-Los Angeles County Bar Association, Social Security Section, "Practicing Social Security Law in Federal Court" September 1998
-Beverly Hills Bar Association, "Social Security, Medicare, and MediCal" September 1997
-Los Angeles County Bar Association, Social Security Section, "The DOT and Vocational Expert Testimony After Moncada and Johnson" September 1995

Example Cases

I have presented briefs in three cases to the United States Supreme Court. I argued Black & Decker Disability Plan v. Nord to the United States Supreme Court in April 2003.

Supreme Court Decisions
-Black & Decker Disability Plan v. Nord, U.S. (2003)
-Delta Family-Care Disability Survivorship Plan v. Regula, U.S. (2003) (memorandum disposition)

Court of Appeals Decisions
-Alford v. DCH Foundation Group Long-Term Life Ins. Co., 311 F.3d 955 (2002)
-Nord v. Black & Decker Disability Plan, 269 F.3d 823 (9th Cir. 2002) vacated U.S. (2003)
-Bruton v. Massanari, 268 F.3d 824 (9th Cir. 2001)
-Hart v. Massanari, 266 F.3d 1155 (9th Cir. 2001)
-Regula v. Delta Family-Care Disability Survivorship Plan, 266 F.3d 1130 (9th Cir. 2001) vacated U.S. (2003)
-Moore v. Apfel, 216 F.3d 864 (9th Cir. 2000)
-Stewart v. Thorpe Holding Co. Profit Sharing Plan, 207 F.3d 1143 (9th Cir. 2000) cert. denied, 531 U.S 1074 (2001)
-Silveira v. Apfel, 204 F.3d 1257 (9th Cir. 2000)
-Meanel v. Apfel, 172 F.3d 1111 (9th Cir. 1999)
-Chavez v. Department of Health and Human Services, 103 F.3d 849 (9th Cir. 1996)
-Hearn v. Western Conf. of Teamsters Pens. Trust Fund, 68 F.3d 301 (9th Cir. 1995)
-Flores v. Shalala, 49 F.3d 562 (9th Cir. 1995)
-Ruffalo v. Patterson (1991) 234 Cal.App.3d 341, 285 Cal.Rptr. 647
-Cooper v. Sullivan, 880 F.2d 1152 (9th Cir. 1989)
-Sprow v. Bowen, 865 F.2d 207 (9th Cir. 1989)
-MacDonald v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., 859 F.2d 742 (9th Cir. 1988)
-Desrosiers v. Secretary of Health & Human Services, 846 F.2d 573 (9th Cir. 1988)

District Court Decisions
-Horizon Outdoor v. City Of Industry, 228 F. Supp.2d 1113 (C.D. Cal. 2002)
-Nickel v. Barnhart, 205 F.Supp.2d 1131 (C.D. Cal. 2002)
-Booth v. Barnhart, 181 F.Supp.2d 1099 (C.D. Cal. 2002)
-Alford v. DCH Foundation Group Long-Term Life Ins. Co., 144 F.Supp.2d 1183 (C.D. Cal. 2001) affirmed 311 F.3d 955 (2002)
-Hoffman v. Halter, 140 F.Supp.2d 1056 (C.D. Cal. 2001)
-Azami v. Apfel, 24 F.Supp.2d 1007 (C.D. Cal. 1998)
-Perez v. Chater, 17 F.Supp.2d 1115 (C.D. Cal. 1997)
-Payan v. Chater, 959 F.Supp. 1157 (C.D. Cal. 1997)
-Barbato v. Commissioner of Soc. Sec. Admin., 923 F.Supp. 1273 (C.D. Cal. 1996)
-Stanistreet v. Chater, 21 F.Supp.2d 1129 (C.D. Cal. 1995)
-Wysocki v. Sullivan, 761 F.Supp. 1273 (C.D. Cal. 1991)

Education

Degree:

Juris Doctorate

School:

Whittier Law School

City:

Los Angeles

State:

CA

Year:

1985

Honors:

Cum Laude

Focus and Accomplishments:

Law

Number of Attorneys

7

State Licensed In

California

Firm Focus and History

The Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing provides representation to the disabled seeking Social Security and other disability benefits. The firm has its principal office in Santa Fe Springs, California conveniently located near the I-5 and I-605 interchange across the street from the Norwalk Metrolink station. Rohlfing & Kalagian serves the needs of clients in Long Beach, California near the end of the Blue Line. Both offices seek to enforce the rights of the disabled to benefits at all levels of administrative and court review. The offices have two partners, five associates, one attorney of counsel, and one retired member of the firm.

* Social Security
* Disability Benefits
* Initial Application
* Reconsideration
* Hearings
* Appeals
* Reviews
* Representation in Court

The Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing and Rohlfing & Kalagian handle over a thousand disability claims annually. The firms represent claimants for Social Security disability before the Social Security Administration at initial application, on reconsideration, at hearing before the Office of Hearings and Appeals, before the Appeals Council on request for review, and before the courts. Both offices seek out to represent those claimants that the Social Security Administration has wrongfully denied through all levels of appeal. Many clients come to the offices for primary representation before the Social Security Administration. Lawyers from all over California request the attorneys take over representation at the Appeals Council, the United States District Court, and the United States Court of Appeals. The work of the firms has led to decisions from the courts that have changed the way in which the Social Security Administration must adjudicate claims for disability benefits from the District Court, the Court of Appeals, and the Supreme Court.

The members of the firm actively share their experience with other lawyers across in the nation in how to better represent claimants.

The Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing and Rohlfing & Kalagian offer two offices located in Santa Fe Springs, California and Long Beach, California. Our Santa Fe Springs office assists clients throughout California to include: Whittier, La Mirada, Norwalk, Pico Rivera, Montebello, Downey, Cerritos, Paramount, Compton, South Gate, Commerce, Bell, Bell Gardens, Brea, Fullerton, and surrounding cities. Our Long Beach office assists the South Bay, Paramount, Lakewood, and North Orange County.

We provide a no cost consultation on all disability claims and offer representation on a contingency fee basis. If you are seeking disability benefits, there will be no charge for attorney fees until we win your case.

Previous Employment Summary

Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing
Owner and Proprietor of seven-attorney firm (Santa Fe Springs).
February 1, 1989 to present

Rohlfing & Kalagian, LLP
Partner of three-attorney satellite office (Long Beach).
June 1, 2003 to present

Rohlfing and Donnelly
Partner in two-attorney firm.
July 1, 1987 to January 31, 1989

Williams and Rohlfing
Partner in two-attorney firm.
December 10, 1985 to June 30, 1987

Activities and Awards

I am a sustaining member of the National Organization of Social Security Claimants' Representatives (NOSSCR). I currently serve as the Ninth Circuit Representative to the NOSSCR Board of Directors and currently serve as the Treasurer of NOSSCR sitting on the Executive Board. I am the past chair of the Los Angeles County Bar Association Social Security Section. I have presented numerous papers to the bi-annual meetings of NOSSCR, the Los Angeles County Bar Association Social Security Section, the Beverly Hills Bar Association, the Southeast Bar Association of Los Angeles County, and the National Business Institute.

Community Involvement
La Mirada Little League - manager 1994, 1995, Winter 1995, 1996
La Habra Little League - manager 1997, Winter 1997, 2001, 2004, 2005, coach 2003
Whittier Pony Baseball - manager 1998
La Habra Girls Softball - head coach 1999, 2000
La Mirada Jr. All American Football - coach 1998
La Habra Pop Warner - team representative 1999, coach 2000, 2001, 2005
La Habra Christian Church - elder 2001-2006, vice chair 2002, chair 2003-2006

What is your opinion regarding clients educating themselves on legal issues?

A claimant for Social Security benefits can present their own claim and achieve a certain level of success. When it comes to the hearing and appeals level, a claimant for benefits should have a lawyer or other qualified representative.

Are you willing to review documents prepared by clients?

Yes. Clients need to complete significant documents in the prosecution of a Social Security claim.

Are you willing to coach clients who want to represent themselves?

There is limited guidance that counsel can provide to a claimant who does not want representation that would not in and of itself constitute the same work that would be required if representation were provided. An attorney could not charge or receive a fee for such advice, so providing those services would be problematic.

Why did you decide to be a lawyer?

I decided to become a lawyer because I thought I could help people and do a better job than the lawyers who I had met while a youth.

What work experience and education helps you be a better lawyer?

I have practiced law my entire adult life and dedicated myself to providing quality representation.

Why did you decide on your primary area of practice?

Social Security Disability is the area that can have the biggest impact on people and represent the most number of people who need my help.

What do you like best about your career?

Practicing Social Security and other disability work has given me the opportunity to engage in trial work before the Social Security Administration, quasi-appellate work before the United States District Court, appellate work before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, and work for the United States Supreme Court. I thoroughly enjoy my career.

Tell us about your law firm:

The Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing provides representation to the disabled seeking Social Security and other disability benefits. The firm has its principal office in Santa Fe Springs, California conveniently located near the I-5 and I-605 interchange across the street from the Norwalk Metrolink station. Rohlfing & Kalagian serves the needs of clients in Long Beach, California near the end of the Blue Line. Both offices seek to enforce the rights of the disabled to benefits at all levels of administrative and court review. The offices have two partners, five associates, one attorney of counsel, and one retired member of the firm.

The Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing and Rohlfing & Kalagian handle over a thousand disability claims annually. The firms represent claimants for Social Security disability before the Social Security Administration at initial application, on reconsideration, at hearing before the Office of Hearings and Appeals, before the Appeals Council on request for review, and before the courts. Both offices seek out to represent those claimants that the Social Security Administration has wrongfully denied through all levels of appeal. Many clients come to the offices for primary representation before the Social Security Administration. Lawyers from all over California request the attorneys take over representation at the Appeals Council, the United States District Court, and the United States Court of Appeals. The work of the firms has led to decisions from the courts that have changed the way in which the Social Security Administration must adjudicate claims for disability benefits from the District Court, the Court of Appeals, and the Supreme Court.

What are your strengths and style?

I have the ability to handle the hardest cases--cases typically no one else wants to handle.

We aggressively represent claimants before the Social Security Administration, District Court, and Court of Appeals.

Personal Interests:

I am active in the community, youth sports, and Church affairs.

Office Manager/Assistant

Kelly Hernandez

Fax

(562) 868-5491

Office Hours

Monday through Friday
8:30 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.,
1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Closed on all federal holidays.

Emergency After Hours

No

Foreign Languages

Multiple staff speak Spanish.

Additional Offices

Long Beach, CA
211 East Ocean Boulevard
Suite 240
Long Beach, CA 90802
(562) 868-5886

Fixed-Price Services and Fees

Fees are contingent, typically 25% of past due benefits or $5,300; whichever is less for a hearing level case.

Hourly Rates

None.

Free Initial Consultation?

There is no charge for the initial consultation.

Typical Retainer

There is no up-front retainer. All fees are contingent on recovery.

Understanding Fees

Nolo's Licensing Check

Attorneys have passed a licensing check. Nolo has confirmed that every member attorney has a valid license and is in good standing with the applicable bar associations upon joining the directory.

Directory lawyers are required to notify Nolo immediately if they become the subject of any disciplinary action by any bar association.