Nolo Logo Lawyer Directory Newsletter Nolo Now: Nolo's Online Document Service Blogs Cart
Save 37% during Nolo's Anniversary Sale
Trials, Sentencing, and Appeals
Nolo turns 37! Save 37% on everything. Excludes select H. R. titles & all state filing fees. Sale ends 12/01/08.
Find a Criminal Defense Lawyer
Save 37% on online legal documents. Excludes all state filing fees. Sale ends 12/01/08.
Criminal Law Handbook
The Criminal Law Handbook: Know Your Rights, Survive the System
Book / $25.19
eBook / $24.99


 

Defendants' Rights During a Court Trial: The Bill of Rights
« prev  Page 2 of 4  next »

Right to a Public Trial

The Sixth Amendment guarantees public trials in criminal cases. This is an important right, because the presence in courtrooms of a defendant's family and friends, ordinary citizens, and the press can help ensure that the government observes important rights associated with trials.

In a few situations -- normally involving children -- the court will close the court to the public. For example, judges can bar the public from attending cases when defendants are charged with sexual assaults against children. Also, the judge may exclude witnesses from the courtroom in order to prevent a witness from influencing the subsequent testimony of another.

Right to a Jury Trial

The Sixth Amendment gives a person accused of a crime the right to be tried by a jury, except for petty offenses carrying a sentence of six months or less of jail time. This right has traditionally been interpreted to mean a 12-person jury. However, a jury can constitutionally consist of as few as six persons, but defendants tried by six-person juries can be convicted only if the jury is unanimous in favor of guilt.

In most cases, a unanimous verdict is required to convict a defendant. In most states, a lack of unanimity is called a "hung jury," and the defendant will go free unless the prosecutor decides to retry the case. In Oregon and Louisiana, however, juries may convict or acquit a defendant on a vote of ten to two. And the U.S. Supreme Court has upheld a state law providing for less-than-unanimous verdicts by 12-person juries in non-death penalty cases.

Potential jurors must be selected randomly from the community, and the actual jury must be selected by a process that allows the judge and lawyers to screen out biased jurors. In addition, a lawyer may eliminate several potential jurors simply because he feels that these people would not be sympathetic to his side -- but these decisions (called "peremptory challenges") may not be based on the juror's personal characteristics such as race, sex, religion, or national origin.


Reprint permissions  

« prev  1 2 3 4  next »

Judge Joe Brown ad
Survive a PC disaster with Carbonite online backup. Try it free!